bipartisan

It’s a uniparty with factions. Call it for what it actually is.

There is nothing illegal about packaging Redis, or other open-source projects depending on it, irrespective of jurisdiction.

And Arch has no customers to worry about if they accidentally depend on a package that restricts closed-source commercialization, not that it’s a distro’s job to pick on that anyway. Commercial entities are supposed to have a process that checks the licenses of all dependencies. If you know how to reliably avoid AGPL, then you know how to reliably avoid RSAL and SSPL.

And I’m liking the cognitive dissonance of dissing Redis while praising Red Hat 🙂

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Ghislaine Maxwell was on the news around the world. Is that not enough?

/c/BadTechHistory

I wrote “the majority”, not everyone.

Also

Akshually, we are all here. everyone is just using 10 different alts.

That would be almost worse with the real size/reach of Lemmy in mind, that is if this was true. Good thing it isn’t.

Community has “Lemmy” in its name, sidebar mentions vents, and I’m not genuinely angry or emotionally charged about this, the title is just exaggerated.

I don’t know. It felt appropriate here. And it definitely counts as a shitpost from my own perspective.

That’s not the original.
Hint: any version that doesn’t mention “communists” is “filtered”.

Killed an underage American boy in the very same country that is getting bombed again.

you’re a vampire acting in total deniability while you smell for blood.

omg 😲

asshole, stop insulting people

huh 🙄

Just because you don’t get it

get what 🤔

doesn’t warrant any corrossive purposeless insults being validated as any kind of quality character.

the irony 🙂

Couldn’t decipher what you wrote there. Maybe it’s a result of the same cognitive dissonance that would push someone to deliberately support and buy vendor-locked Linux-unfriendly hardware, then want to run Linux on it.

Without Asahi, you can’t run Linux on Macbooks.

good.

Check out the crate indexmap. Check its dependants too if you want to see how higher level abstractions can be built utilizing it.

What happens if you use an out of range array subscript a[n]? Does that always return an option type?

It never returns an option type. This Index interface happens to be actually noisy as implemented for some std types. Although you can implement it however you like for your own data types (including ones just wrapping the std ones). And we have checked access (example) and unchecked access (example) as methods.

It’s actually astonishing the lengths you’re taking to NOT learn anything, to the point of just imagining things about Rust that are supposedly done wrong compared to Ada.

Wrapping and Saturating are available as data types in std. Checked can’t be a (useful) data type as-is because it by definition changes the type of the return value of operations (Option<T> instead of T). But you can trivially add a noisy/signalling wrapper yourself if you wish to (basically doing checked ops and unwrapping all results). An example of something offering a noisy interface is a crate named noisy_float.

Rust supports wrapping, saturating, and checked operations, which allows you to precisely define the behavior you want from your math operations, and avoiding ever hitting an (unchecked) overflow.

I don’t downvote people, but since you asked.

here has been a zlib in Ada for many years, doing its job quietly.

Who asked?

Speed comparable to the C version, probably not beating it, but not trailing by much in any case.

There is no one C version. The version being referred to is the original zlib, which happens to be the worst implementation of four possible zlib back-ends available in the flate2 crate. Besides the original zlib and zlib-rs, there is zlib-ng and cloudflare_zlib, both of which are also (still) implemented in C.

So being comparable to the original zlib is hardly something to shout about. In fact, individual hobbyists have been beating that implementation just for fun for many years.

Rust is safer than C but less safe than Ada from what I can tell.

Rust (edited for clarity) looks to me to be about halfway between C and C++ in complexity, with a bunch of footguns removed, and using implicit move semantics (“borrowing”) more than C++ does, and the notorious borrow checker is simply the compiler making sure you don’t make RAII mistakes because of that.

That’s a lot of inaccurate waffling that could have been entirely written by an LLM, except it’s probably too wrong for it to have been done so.

Source? What is the percentage of trolls that were even chased and successfully denonymized?

https://sizeof.cat/project/the-devault-report/