

It’s really optimistic to think that the greater public will start to think of LLMs output as unreliable and not trustworthy some day.
Verspielt verspult 🧑💻
It’s really optimistic to think that the greater public will start to think of LLMs output as unreliable and not trustworthy some day.
I don’t know what you are using the card for, but I don’t think you will be able to saturate that pcie5 speeds. In gaming and everyday usage at least you won’t be able to spot the difference.
Therefor we got Finamp now, which is really good and about to get even better.
At least they don’t cheap out on the VRAM if there really is a 16GB variant
Their FAQ says kind of:
Many other devices are supported by GrapheneOS at a source level, and it can be built for them without modifications to the existing GrapheneOS source tree. […] In most cases, substantial work beyond that will be needed to bring the support up to the same standards. For most devices, the hardware and firmware will prevent providing a reasonably secure device, regardless of the work put into device support.
The requirements that GrapheneOS has on the hardware, like relocking the bootloader and hardware level access, should be part of rights to repair / digital markets act imo. They are even considering producing their own hardware in the future.
The GrapheneOS forums say there is no intent on implementing this. It will probably be locked behind Google play services anyway.
Could be a great opportunity for MLC Chat, which uses OpenCL.
Or forbid network access in graphene os
Favourite Far Cry 2 and 3 are the best of the bunch imho
Would be nice if there could be an implementation by someone else than apple or google
That would only be stupid if you can’t live without ray tracing or you profit of NVIDIA-optimized software. The frame per dollar ratio has always been better on AMD since only the rasterization performace is key here. I have had only AMD cards in the past, currently being on a 6700xt, and never had any problems.
Recently tried to make a printer scan a file to an exFAT formatted thumb drive, didn’t go well. Then tried moving a file from a windows to a linux machine using another exFAT formatted thumb drive, still no luck lol.
And people for the other 1/3.
It’s already on Ollama. Exciting times!
The only admin left that has access to the server has gone missing for some time now. In itself this wouldn’t be too bad, but to name a few issues:
Of course they are, it’s not like there is some kind of international jurisdiction anyway. What is bothersome is why they do it.
It’s called Ruwiki.
It was launched in June 24, 2023 as a fork of the Russian Wikipedia, and has been described by some media groups as “Putin-friendly” and “Kremlin-compliant”.
It’s not about authorization. They want to build a knowledge base for when the Great Firewall gets some more filters. Just like russias mirror of wikipedia which is heavily edited to discredit the west.
This game hits like crack mixed with slot machines.
Edit: I thought this is about data and not the storage media itself lol.
Obvious answer: It depends.
One individual can have TBs of storage assigned to them, like a cloud storage with years worth of high res family photos or videos, or TBs worth of… homework and Linux distros. This would be nearly useless / cost more to gather than it has a value.
On the other hand, a group of people can have mere kilobytes of text messages between them that is potentially worth millions of dollars stored on a server, like trade secrets or war plans.
A special case to consider: The data of John Doe type individuals I described first can be a valuable asset too if its not one individual but a big accumulation of thousands / millions of people, especially of they can be made comparable to one another. We see this in advertising and will probably realize this value more and more in crowd surveillance and control / opinion making. Especially if all of this data gets analyzed and reduced to machine readable tokens, possibly even on the users end devices, which means the data gets more valuable and more compact at the same time.
My final answer would be: It effectively ranges from negative to positive millions / billions of $ per any given unit.