• badbrainstorm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    In this day and age of compression, you can get a very small file in good quality.

    If your hardware will run it, MPV/265 is fantastic! Especially the 10 bit rips

          • Blackmist@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 hours ago

            I don’t think it’s got a hardware decoder in it for AV1. Whether it can play is very much dependent on the file.

            I can’t see the extra pixels, but they tend to be the only versions with Dolby Vision, etc. I do think the HDR version looks better.

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Every time I pirate something x265, it looks like somebody took the pixels and threw it in the blender. Like I could notice the degredation in quality and it irritates me since it’s supposed to be 1080p.

      I download the normal x264 and everything looks fine.

      And I doing piracy incorrectly?

      • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        The issue is that, while x265 is more efficient, it’s not THAT much more efficient until you get to 4k or high bitrates. Encoders using x265 tend to be overly focused on file size, and prioritize it over video quality. And that sort of makes sense - x265 needs a lot more decoding power, and excludes a lot of otherwise capable devices. Why would you do that to only save a small percentage of the space needed?

      • badbrainstorm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        265 is more bandwidth efficient than 264. If you put two video streams next to each other, 100% identical, running at the same bitrate, except one is H.264 and one is 265, 265 will look better.

        265 can achieve the same visual fidelity as 264 at 20-40% lower bitrate, depending on a few factors. The trade off is you need more processing.

        If either are looking pixilated, you’re getting ones with to much compression. I still try and get ones at around a gig or larger. Especially if you’re watching on a big screen. And like I said, if your hardware will run it without getting all laggy, 10 or 12 bit is good for rgb color depth