• ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Speaking to BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, he said: “Is it where the money comes from? The script, the director, the talent, where it was shot?”

    These are the important questions to asking. I imagine there won’t be strict definitions of “US made” films instead it will be a “vibes” based criteria used to punish people who go against the Trump Administration’s policies.

    • reptar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 hours ago

      It’s another control gate on the economy that he can manipulate. He is basically finding ways to insert himself in his amounts of commerce. It’s a trump tax via bribes

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 hours ago

    There would be retaliation and Hollywood exports far more than the US imports with entertainment. This would cause much more damage for the US film industry.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 hours ago

      hollywood caters to asia mostly now, thats why alot of the movies and actors kinda suck now. thier us market somewhat dying.

  • k0e3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 hours ago

    How would that even work? At what point do you charge the tariff?

    • Furbag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 hours ago

      That’s a good question. Everything is digital nowadays, so it’s not like we’re getting film reels from Bollywood.

      If I had to wager a guess, the cinemas would probably be paying the tariff at the time of acquiring the license to show the film.

  • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I think this is good. It will help local (outside the US) artistic industries space to flourish without being threatened by Hollywood.

    Movies all over the world face inmence pressure form competing from Hollywood, buy without that pressure, they could focus on their local strengths instead.

    Yeah USians are probably fucked though, but it’s kinda bad to feel bad for the facists and their enablers.

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      i don’t really see how… it’ll make movies from outside the US more expensive inside the US, but it doesn’t effect the price of US movies elsewhere

      … without retaliation from many other countries of course, but idk if that’ll happen really: europe has kinda gone with retaliating in other areas: specific to applying pressure rather than broad

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 hours ago

        International movie makers will stop trying to appease Hollywood because they know that it’s very unlikely their movies will play in the US. So they will focus on other international markets. It’s the same thing we saw with the other tariffs, right? Buyers and sellers are going to look for new business deals in every other country in the world because it makes more sense than dealing with a lunatic who were randomly impose and erase tariffs.

  • Pnut@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I was under the impression that they film a great deal of movies in Canada because it costs far less than filming anywhere else. We also have places that look very modern while maintaining very gothic cities and all of the land in between that could be filmed to look like many places abroad. So he’s costing the film industry the savings that they have gotten used to by filming in Canada. Art of the deal.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Apart from the point that this would be illegal (he won’t know or care, but it is), imagine other countries responding in kind? At least our country imports more media from the US than we produce on our own. And the return tarrifs costs and losses caused by that would also hit primarily US companies like Netflix, Disney, Amazon, AplleTV…

  • AngrySquirrel@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ok? This is current year, I can just use a VPN to stream foreign movies.

    I am so tired of all the BS this regime keeps throwing at everything.

  • Dzso@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    As a dual US and EU citizen, good!* European movies are better than that Hollywood shit anyway.

    *for the record, neither this nor anything else Trump is doing is actually good.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Uh, ok, what?

    Are we trying to drown out foreign influence now? Like, idk, China? North Korea?

    Media is our biggest GDP dollar. Donnie is playing with fire here. I’d bet my life savings he backs down, like he has on everything else.

  • andallthat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The US being by far the biggest exporter of movies, the only way this makes sense is that Trump is not seeing enough ass-kissing (and bribes campaign donations) from the US movie industry, so he’s actively trying to damage them.

    Claim foreign movies are a threat, wait for other countries to retaliate against US movies, sit back and watch bribes sales of $TRUMP grow as the major studios seek his political favor.

    • ToastedRavioli@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I mean at least this is one of the situations where at its base a tariff makes sense in an industry protectionist way. Its not like putting insane tariffs on goods we dont even manufacture here whatsoever, which is just stupid.

      That said, a 100% tariff is just mind bogglingly stupid dick-swinging in this already hostile trade environment. It would make more sense if it was like 5%. Not something that will make the world boycott our media

      • Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        I mean at least this is one of the situations where at its base a tariff makes sense in an industry protectionist way

        Except for the fact that - under no circumstances - do you need tariffs to protect a wildly successful industry. That makes no sense because there’s nothing to protect against. It can literally only do harm.