This seems to be a black and white issue for many, always Yes or always No.

As with most thigns I feel the truth is somewhere in the middle.

It’s a spectrum

IMO

A biological man who never underwent puberty and never got the benefits of higher testosterone etc. should be allowed in women’s sports.

But, someone like Usain Bolt, who because of undergoing male puberty has bigger bones than he would have had if he didn’t, should never be allowed to compete in women’s sports.

Where we draw the line, I don’t know, but I don’t think it’s black or white.

  • Gabadabs@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    No. Goddamn why do you people seem to think discrimination against entire demographics of people is justified with the weak excuse of “sports need to be FAIR”. I’m sorry but even if you limit to only cis people some competitors have genetic advantages others don’t. Inclusion of anyone who wants to compete is way more important. If you actually cared about fairness, and not discrimination, you’d want sports to limit who can compete against who by physical ability, not gender.

    • AnonomousWolf@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Sport has always had devisions and you need to draw lines who is and isn’t allowed in a devision.

      Example: Under 21 years old Undee 80kg Handicapped Ober 40 years old Women’s Etc.

      You can’t just let anyone compete in any devision else you don’t have devisions, and you need to draw lines where those devisions begin and end.

      All I’m saying is IMO when it comes to the Women’s devision, it’s shouldn’t be black and white.

      • betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        devisions

        Divisions

        devision

        Division

        Undee

        Under

        Ober

        Over

        devision

        Division

        devisions

        Divisions

        devisions

        Divisions

        devision

        Division

      • Gabadabs@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        “you need to draw lines who is and who isn’t allowed in a division” No you don’t. You really really don’t. “competitive fairness” is not a justification for discrimination of minority demographics. You CAN, in fact, just let anyone compete. It’s not that big of a deal, and the inclusion is a lot more important than transphobic fearmongering.

    • AnonomousWolf@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      How is that productive? I’m open to having my mind changed and would like to have a conversation about this. Calling someone a bigot does nothing to change their mind and is against the rules of c/controversial

  • superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    It. Simply. Isn’t. A. Problem.
    Professional womens sports aren’t dominated by trans women, and they never will be.
    And no man would transition in order to dominate womens sports.

    The entire debate is a straw-man for splitting women into “real” and “fake” ones, denying trans women the right to exist.

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Good for her.
        If it turns out that she has an unfair advantage, and the IPF, CPU and other powerlifting organisations feel like it’s damaging the sport, they can make a ruling on a case by case basis (which they always could and in this case have, by suspending her).
        To ensure that the sport of powerlifting stays free from competitors with elevated testosterone levels (/s).

        There is absolutely no reason to try and come up with a “solution” for all transgender people in all sports.

        • AnonomousWolf@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          We can’t set a limit on testosterone levels, because then biological women like Caster Semenya, who naturally has high testosterone, are forced to take T blockers (This actually happened to her)

          And wouldn’t that allow women to dope up until an acceptable level?

          Where do you draw the line?

          • superkret@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            I don’t. There doesn’t need to be a line.

            Just let the sports associations each make their rules and decide on conflicts when they come up, as they have always done.

            Most of them have very lax rules because it really isn’t a problem that comes up often.

            • AnonomousWolf@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              I can accept spots deciding for themselves.

              However a lot of sports have decided that trans women who went through male puberty aren’t allowed in their women’s devision.

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Well, it’s certainly a controversial opinion. Largely because everyone spouting it is just showing exactly how little they know about the effects of hrt.

    And, when you add in the ever asinine “the truth is in the middle” it underscores that because the truth is in the data. This isn’t an opinion about blue being prettier than red. It’s an “opinion” about the very understood and easy to research effects of hormones on the human body.

    And I’ll say this part again because no jackass that brays this malarkey ever ponies up, where are all the records broken by trans women? Because there’s places they compete with cis women, and there’s no giant wave of new records being set.

    Do people really not even think to look and see if there’s been any fucking changes in sports where trans women compete? Are people that fucking stupid? Oh, wait, what am I saying, of course they are

    You do not know jack shit about this subject and need to shut your fucking piehole, you jackass. Fuck, people are so fucking dumb

    • AnonomousWolf@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Studies show that biological mens hands are 20%+ bigger than biological women.

      HRT isn’t going to make your hands 20% smaller, bigger hands give you an advantage in many sports eg. swimming.

      • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Are you really going to parrot Joe fucking Rogan’s mindless bullshit?

        Since you did, even the most successful trans elan woman swimmer not only dropped her times significantly, but lost far more often than she won. And that’s the best trans swimmer out there.

        Again, you failed to do anything other than jerk yourself off to your fetish of imagining things about trans women. Because you definitely didn’t go and look up a fucking thing you know how I know that? I went and reverified my previous searches on the matter the last time some brain dead fuckstick ran this bullshit trying to pretend they weren’t just a worm brained bigot.

        And guess what, I looked up the most successful trans women in mma as well, and even she didn’t have some kind of flawless record, despite the man hands. She did have a damn solid record indeed, but not perfect, and it got cut short, so there’s that.

        Boxing? No trans champions.

        Running? No world records held by trans women that I could find, and while it’s a hard field to look up because there’s so many different events, there are records and they are well documented.

        Fuck, there was a weightlifter, the single sport where you could realistically claim that any bone changes made while a man would be most likely to vary carry over. That dude went from top rankings as a man, to a lady in the middle rankings. And that’s fucking weightlifting, where muscle attachment points matter more than anything except maybe the hammer throw, or sumo.

        But here’s the real fucking kicker to all this. I tell you exactly what the flaw in your little poorly disguised bigotry, and you couldn’t be bothered to do anything other than “big hands”.

        You are fucking pimple on the asshole of humanity. You’re a fucking dingleberry hanging off of an ass pimple.

        You could have at least put in some fucking effort, but noooooo, that would require a functional brain.

        GTFO you half witted, vile little piece of shit. Come at me with your man hands bullshit. Waste of fucking oxygen.

        • AnonomousWolf@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Jeeeze relax, Read the about of the sub.

          This is not a safe space nor an echo-chamber, you come here to discuss in a civilized way, no flaming, no insults!

          I’m trying to have a conversation, after all the insults I’m done talking to you.

          • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            No, you are not trying to have a conversation, you’re spreading the same bullshit bigotry that’s all over the place already. You can’t hide behind “just asking questions”, or “just having a discussion” when you’re spewing the same bullshit that has gotten people killed and beaten.

            • AnonomousWolf@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              Look at the sub you are in.

              I feel the way I do, and I am open to having my mind changed. Getting angry at me and immediately using insults like shut your fucking piehole isn’t going to change my mind, and is against the rules of this sub.

              I would like to have my mind changed, if I’m not allowed to have a conversation about how I feel, how is that going to happen?

              • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 days ago

                Horse shit.

                If you wanted your mind changed, you wouldn’t have come back with the man hands drek. You’d have done it exactly as I suggested and looked up the world records of a bunch of sports and seen the absolute tiny amount of them that are held by trans athletes, and the fact that with only unusual outliers, none of those so far outstripped previous records as to be significant in comparison to the standard increase in records over time as the science behind sports medicine optimizes training.

                But, no, you come back with man hands like some lobotomized parrot that’s been forced to watch Rogan.

                If you’re also going to try and hide your bullshit behind community rules, and it is community, not sub because this ain’t fucking reddit, then you aren’t just a bigot you’re a fucking wimp.

                Nah, fuck right off with your fake vomit of bigotry. It’s transparent, it’s obvious, and at this point absurd that you keep trying to pretend that this is anything other than dog whistling jackassery.

    • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s not as simple as specifically t levels, but you’ve got the idea. Splitting leagues by physical ability rather than gender or sex, as they do in fighting with heavyweights, featherweights, etc

    • AnonomousWolf@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      What testosterone level you were at during puberty has a big impact on the size of your bones. So it’s not that simple.

      People who had high testosterone during puberty have much bigger hands than people who didn’t, hand size has a impact on sports.

      • Estiar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        What sports do you get an advantage with bigger hands? Are we going to get rid of cisgender women who have big hands too for those reasons too? I’m not even sure where you’re getting this hand size thing anyway

        • AnonomousWolf@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          I’d think swimming, but a better example might be basketball.

          Going through male puberty would make you taller than you would have otherwise been, and in basketball beign taller gives you an advantage.

          • Estiar@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            With swimming, one would have to push through more body with the same muscle mass (or even less due to suppressed testosterone instead of natural cis woman levels)

            Basketball will have some of the same issues to a lesser extent, although the natural different variations will still make up for it. My sister (Cisgender) is taller than I am (Trans girl)

    • AnonomousWolf@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      IMO having bigger bones is an advance in many sports.

      HRT isn’t going to make your bone structure significantly smaller

      • RedSeries (She/Her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Michael Phelps is a freak of nature, with an incredible wingspan and a body that produces less lactic acid than nearly every other swimmer. He was allowed to take home 28 gold medals, and was only able to do so with those genetic advantages and fucktons of work and training.

        Bone structure, height, or hand size clearly do not matter to people at the highest levels, and likely matter even less when you’re playing in your high school or college soccer league.

        And I mentioned the work and training aspect because without that, Phelps would be very good, but not 28-gold-medals good. You’re boiling down women’s sports to essentially hand size and genetics. Best get out the calipers to start measuring skull sizes (/s).

        Can you even name 5 women athletes without looking them up? Do you really care about women if you’re trying to subject them to this scrutiny to “catch” an incredibly miniscule part of the population? Are women with PCOS or other endocrine disorders not allowed? How would you even test for this shit? You can’t even give us clear definitions of what “fair” would be.

  • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    What if we don’t split sports by gender or sex, but instead by physical ability? Those with birthdays towards the end of the school year also have a biological advantage.

      • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Did you understand my suggestion? There would be different teams, split by approximate physical ability.

        • AnonomousWolf@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          How do you even begin to measure that?

          Hight, bone density, muscle weight etc plays such a massive role.

          • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            I would leave it up to sports experts to measure it, which I am not one. It’s still a good idea, even if I don’t have the expertise to work out the details. I can see from other comments though that you are either a troll or very stupid, intentionally or unintentionally misunderstanding what we say to you. So this comment is not to you, it’s to all the lurkers and readers of comments that might otherwise be convinced by your arguments without a counterpoint.

        • peto (he/him)@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          I assume you mean something like weight classes in combat sports? No one expects a welterweight to fight a heavyweight. And the existence of either class doesn’t reduce the achievements of anyone not in it.

          • AnonomousWolf@lemm.eeOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            Let’s use combat sports, how would you measure “approximate physical ability” ?

            If you just go by weight and don’t split the genders, biological women won’t stand a chance.

            • peto (he/him)@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 days ago

              I don’t know. Weight alone is likely a poor measure, and one we see exploited in combat sports to the harm and even death of competators. Working that specifically out is a question for sports scientists I think, rather than basing it on the feelings and biases of spectators.

              What I am talking about is the cultural acceptance of sectioned competition, and that it doesn’t reduce the achievements and glory of competators.

              • AnonomousWolf@lemm.eeOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 days ago

                Basing the rules of your sports on the feelings and biases of spectators sounds wild.

                and is open for abuse, if most spectators want to disqualify a person because they don’t like them, they would be able to.