"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-21 day agoWere you aware?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageWere you aware?lemmy.world"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-21 day agomessage-square14fedilink
minus-squareJackGreenEarth@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 day agoAnecdotal evidence is so strong! There’s definitely no way you could be making a generalised statement from a single incident… /s
minus-squarelugal@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 day ago… because generalizations are always wrong, each and every time
minus-squareBlueFootedPetey@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·23 hours agoSounds like a generalization, which I guess is wrong.
minus-squaresolsangraal@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 day agoi get it: you’re making a generalizing statement about generalizations being wrong, which makes the statement wrong
Anecdotal evidence is so strong!
There’s definitely no way you could be making a generalised statement from a single incident… /s
… because generalizations are always wrong, each and every time
Sounds like a generalization, which I guess is wrong.
thatsthejoke.zip
i get it: you’re making a generalizing statement about generalizations being wrong, which makes the statement wrong
At least one person gets the joke