I’m looking for places with less censorship so we can have actual discussions instead of only allowing comments that support the trans agenda.
That level of censorship does not help their cause; it actively hinders it because regular people aren’t allowed to have their own beliefs on the matter. Either they succumb to the hysteria, or they’re ousted.
I’d honestly be surprised if even asking this question didn’t result in censorship. That’s how bad things have gotten.
Edit: Plenty of personal attacks, but no legitimate answers! Did anyone come to this thread to actually answer the question?
The agenda of being able to exist?
What other “agenda” do you think they have?
Do you know any communities that allow criticism of transgenderism?
I’d be much more willing to answer your questions if I was confident that my replies wouldn’t be censored for disagreeing with you.
Again:
What kind of criticism?
Like I can criticize my friend for not recycling, no one will complain. If I say they shouldn’t be allowed to exist because of an immutable physical characteristic, I’d be a horrible fucking person.
So what exactly do you want to criticize besides their right to exist?
Again:
I’d be much more willing to answer your questions if I was confident that my replies wouldn’t be censored for disagreeing with you.
Do you know any communities that allow criticism of transgenderism? If you can’t answer this, then you can just move on to another thread.
we’ve found the most fragile person on the platform, fuck off back to twitter.
More personal attacks.
more fragility.
So…
You won’t say what you want to say, until I tell you a place it’s allowed to be said?
Do you legitimately and truthfully not understand how that’s impossible?
How is anyone supposed to know where you can say something if you won’t tell them what you want to say?
Logically. How is anyone ever going to be able to answer your question?
Alright well, this is a waste of time.
I’m just going to ignore you and move on since you’re clearly not here to answer the thread’s question.
If you were ignoring people, you wouldn’t be responding to them saying “I’m ignoring you”.
Does that make sense?
To ignore someone, you simply ignore them. I can’t think of a simpler way to explain that…
You are being dishonest. You were just now basically invited to discuss but chose to ignore that and immediately assume a defense position of “not being confident”.
Chances are you will take this post as an example of being oppressed of an opinion as well.
If you are sincere then engage with the person asking a question.
Well, if you want to have this discussion then we’ll have to take it elsewhere.
So you still choose to be dishonest. And a liar. If you want to take “it elsewhere” then that suggests you know of such a place, a thing you keep asking for. But seem to know about it?
I am now convinced you are a social experiment; possibly AI driven or as a biological entity.
Take this exactly as you think how I might mean this.