• N0t_5ure@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      For some reason I’ve been getting the “ad blockers violate the terms of service” nag lately on my firefox browser with ublock origin. My Brave browser doesn’t get it though. Any ideas?

      • frostysauce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        I got that, too, yesterday and the first time I got a helpful pop-up from uBO suggesting I watch in a private window. But simply reloading the page was enough to get the video to play each time it popped up yesterday.

      • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        Youtube/Google is known to bully and lash out against Firefox users first, they use that as a hybrid strategy to make people use Google Chrome more (other market, same corposcum). Not surprised.

      • Lembot_0003@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        uBlock isn’t “install and forget”; it needs some initial setup. Add some “filter lists” and overall look what is there in the settings.

        Still, you should think about that self-esteem thing. Why do you still use that site with “ad blockers violate the terms of service” nagging? Do you really need it?

        • N0t_5ure@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          I installed it and did the setup and it worked great for many months. Then, in the last few days, something changed, though I made no changes to my browser or ublock. Today it works fine. Yesterday I was getting the nag. I didn’t make any changes from yesterday to today.

          • Lembot_0003@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            Some sites actively try to fight adblockers while adblockers try to block anti-adblocking code on such sites. Most probably you’re watching the process of upgrading anti-adblock scripts on such site.

          • Vedlt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            Youtube did something recently and uBlock had to update in response. I think it was automatically rolled out sometime “last night.”

          • Gorge@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            11 days ago

            I might be wrong but I think ad blocker warnings show up briefly after YouTube updates its detection methods. They vanish once filter lists catch up. It’s an ongoing cat-and-mouse game.

            To reduce these warnings, update your ad blocker’s filter lists or they’ll eventually they do so automatically.

            Update Filters: In uBlock Origin, open the dashboard, go to the “Filter lists” tab, and click “Update now.” Keeping uBlock itself updated helps too. Clearing cache can sometimes help. I think Firefox has better uBlock support, Chrome is toxic to adblocker integration.

      • moody@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        I don’t mind sponsorship segments as much. A good content creator finds a way to make those entertaining as well. And if they don’t, a couple presses of the arrow keys does the job.

        • Psythik@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          A “couple presses of the arrow keys” can overshoot, forcing you to hunt around with the mouse to find the content.

          SponsorBlock has an option to skip the segment with a single button press (instead of auto-skipping). You should give it a try before you judge. It’s really convenient.

        • Caesium@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          finally someone who gets it. there are some creators out there who actually make interesting bits out of their sponsorships

          • Crikeste@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            I think it’s also good to remember that, creators who bake in their sponsorships are USUALLY paid upfront for the space.

            Meaning, just skip that shit if it’s not for you. They already got the money.

            At least, this is how I have come to understand sponsorships.

            • TheRealKuni@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              10 days ago

              creators who bake in their sponsorships are USUALLY paid upfront for the space.

              Sure, although if they have a promo code they’re usually getting a percentage kickback from that as well. That’s what the whole Honey scandal was about, PayPal injecting affiliate links and stealing commission from the very people they had paid to advertise their service (and also everyone else).

            • Robust Mirror@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              10 days ago

              It doesn’t affect them getting paid, that’s correct.

              But It does negatively affect their stats which can affect their ability to grow and get that video/their channel seen more. Youtube tracks things like retention and watch %, it matters.

          • PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            11 days ago

            Tomska comes to mind as a pretty hilarious example - not just because he turns them into skits, thats normal enough. He had a whole saga trying to figure out how far he could push the boundries of the VPN company sponsoring him before they would start intervening. It started off simple enough, with the South Park philosophy of “Add provocative stuff so they cut that, rather than the jokes we like.” Rather than editting they script, the approved it as is. He thought it was funny, and took that as a challenge. After increasingly crass and violent ads (on-brand for him, and with appropriate content warnings) eventually ended up going so far as to include an ad that even he considers way too far. Said ad later had to be editted out of the video it was included in. In my opinion, despite obviously being very all ads, its collectively some of the funniest content hes made.

            He’s his videos recapping the saga:

            links

            Dear Surfshark, Please Fire Me

            Dear Surfshark, Please Forgive Me

          • frostysauce@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            I disable Sponsorskip on Some More News because I like watching Cody chug that disgusting looking green stuff. I’m a simple man.

          • katze@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            Maybe there are 5% of channels that produce interesting ads, but:

            • 95% don’t
            • I don’t come there to watch ads, good or bad
    • scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      What’s frustrating is that they’re finally starting to figure out some way to fight them. Been using it for years and last week or so I kept getting dumbass pop-ups that were both unresponsive and ineffectual as ads. All they did was flash a logo and then freeze the player, very frustrating.