• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      RCV undermines the necessity for a partisan vote. That’s why Cuomo - the party establishment pick - lost by 8 points to a local outsider with better politics and a cleaner reputation.

      But I agree, at some point, you do need to support someone. And if that someone is part of a large political organization (aka a party) they can bring a lot of financial and labor resources to bare when organizing and implementing political reforms. In the case of New York City, which is functionally a one party municipality (Dems regularly swamp the GOP 2:1), Zohran’s entrance to the statewide political scene is a huge break from the traditional partisan politics that gave us Eric Adams and threatened to give us four more years of a corrupt, real estate entwined sex pest.

      The fact that he’s got a large, active, well-financed DSA behind him - in a way that transformed a coronation into a competitive primary - is a huge point in his favor.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Yo if telling yourselves that headline is what it takes to get you dudes out there to vote for the DNC so they can get to ending Citizens United, creating fair elections maps, taxing the rich, and expanding medical coverage: power to you. Let’s go!

    • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      AOC is going to need allies and a progressive coalition. We need to change the composition of the party from within in exactly this way. We just need way more of it.

  • CromulantCrow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Every time something hopeful like this appears I start wondering if it’s safe to imagine that maybe things could get better here in the US. But so far I’ve been disappointed over and over. Part of me wants to just skip over the “maybe something good will happen” part and get right to the “oh, well, looks like he was assassinated by a blackwater hit squad” part. Money is power. The donor class gets what they want. And I have no faith that working within the electoral system will fix that.

  • PixelPilgrim@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Ehhh zorhan primary win is more like first big hurtle. Now ZOHRAN has to deal with belligerent part of democratic party and independent runs

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      He already has, up to this point. In fact, big parts of the party tried to support his competition. They failed. He’s another in AOC mould. He may be good or great but there is an increasing trickle of progressive candidates.

      The more that win by being good the more that can win without being so good. He may not be the Dems saviour but he’s a step in the right direction and a worrying sign for Republicans and establishment politicians.

        • arrow74@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          When I hear that Clinton endorsed a canidate my first tthough was, who cares. That guy hasn’t been in office for over 25 years now. Talk about irrelevant

      • PixelPilgrim@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yeah I’m just saying there’s a lot more to go even in this race alone. Just because ZOHRAN WON the primary that doesn’t mean the Democrats leadership will be happy about it

    • berno@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Dems are cooked. Nobody is buying the old guard bullshit anymore. Embrace populism or go the way of the Whigs

      • normalexit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Maybe, probably. They are going to gamble that they can stay the same because people are/will be so mad about… well everything.

        They can prop up a white male moderate with an ounce of charisma, someone that is around 45. People will be refreshed that this candidate speaks in complete sentences and the capacity for empathy – like a real person.

        That’s what they want, business as usual sold as a revolutionary idea. Will people buy it? Who knows… groups of people are pretty dumb.

        • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          They are going to gamble that they can stay the same because people are/will be so mad about… well everything.

          They will 100% try to do this, but they’ll end up losing and then blame the voters they’re maligning. Mamdani is a case-in-point difference between status quo candidate turnouts and progressive candidate turnout. The 7% delta over Cuomo is the 7% they’ll lose if they try it again.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Lets see if you get a President Mamdani in a decade or two. It would be a change for the better.