How to say Marx was right without saying “Marx was right”.

  • jafffacakelemmy@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    In your car crash analogy, we are now past the point where hitting the brakes will help. The car will be irrepairably destroyed and all passengers will be killed.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s why it’s an analogy, and not reality.

      There is no point where hitting the brakes will not help. We can always reduce the amount of harm done.

        • puppinstuff@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 hours ago

          In not an appropriate analogy. We are not just the people in the car, we are the whole neighborhood.

          Even if the people in the car cannot prevent a crash by braking, they can still prevent further damage to people and property by braking as much as possible while within their means.

        • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 hours ago

          The comforting fantasy is the idea that we can throw up our hands and say “We lost.”

          Losing is easy. It demands nothing from us. Losing has no call to action. If we’ve lost, then there’s no fight left to be fought.

          The reality is that the fight is always worth fighting. And that sucks, because it means we never get to give up. We never get to say “It’s over”, and stop caring. Caring is a lot harder.

    • HaiZhung@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      This is flat out wrong. In fact, the more co2 is emitted, the more extreme the consequences are. The change from 0->1 degree of global warming barely registers. The change from 3->4 degrees is catastrophical, for example.

      Thus, the warmer it gets, the more worth it is to fight against it, as each small win contributes more to the bottom line than in the beginning.