Summary

Twenty-one staffers from Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) resigned, citing ethical concerns over dismantling public services and compromising sensitive data.

Formerly part of the U.S. Digital Service, they criticized Musk and Trump’s overhaul, which included layoffs and politically charged interviews.

Their letter warned that removing skilled technologists endangers essential services like Social Security and veterans’ benefits.

The resignations add to growing concerns over Musk’s aggressive federal cuts, amplified by his recent CPAC speech where he symbolically wielded a chainsaw against “bureaucracy.”

  • arc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I was watching an interesting video by an ex-Tesla employee who basically confirmed what we all know - Musk is operationally incompetent and loves to showboat, firing people regardless of their value to the system, piling stress and additional work onto others. And does it even when there are process improvements that would yielded the same savings (or increase profits) and preserve jobs. That’s literally his own mode of operation - work people harder with the threat of firings.

    And now he does the same BS with the federal government. People will die because of this.

  • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I am always confused why they don’t just sabotage the efforts? Like it would be so easy and they definitely aren’t paying attention…

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Different people are able to take on different levels of risk.

      Just because these people resigned doesn’t mean that some other people aren’t staying in for the purposes of being subversive, and you shouldn’t ever hear about the latter.

      • leisesprecher@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s the thing, though. They’re not really taking risks.

        Much of what DOGE does is completely illegal and does not go through the proper channels and processes. By simply doing their jobs and forcing everything through the proper processes, they can slow down everything, maybe even to a halt, while being completely in the right and thus can’t be fired.

        Yes, it takes a mental toll, but these guys have a responsibility.

        • Artyom@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          They’re unemployed government workers, there are less government jobs now than ever, and their resume literally says DOGE on it. They are taking a risk.

          • leisesprecher@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            No. They resigned from a job. They were not fired. And as long as they don’t break any rules, it’s hard to fire them.

            • Artyom@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              I never said they were fired, but since you brought it up, when you’re fired, you’ll usually get a severance to help during the job search, they won’t, they’re just unemployed.

              • leisesprecher@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                … because they resigned. Seriously, what’s your point?

                If they wouldn’t have resigned, they would still have a job. And since they couldn’t have been fired easily, they would have continued to have a job for quite a while.

                That’s not a complex concept, what’s so hard to understand about that?

                • Artyom@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  They resigned from a job they believed was wrong, which will lead to substantial financial consequences for them. You tried to dismiss their efforts as if it was nothing, so I called you out for being dismissive. You say “Seriously, what’s your point?” As if I’m the one making provocative statements from the sidelines.

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      One aspect is that working in that kind of system destroys your mental health. Having to play games to hide the good things, trying to mitigate the bad things. It’s pressure.

      My state has been basically been doing Project 2025 for the past five years. I had a friend in an important position in a fascist overtaken state organization who held on for a long time, fighting the good fight - but it drains. She fought her fucking hardest, but a human being can only fight for so long.

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Sabatoge can carry extremely harsh legal penalties, particularly if it has any type of lasting impact. Beyond that, just phoning it in and doing a bad job can slow things down but doesn’t actually stop it. If you’re then let go it’s on their pace, it looks worse for you and it’s less noticeable.

      A mass resignation can be the only thing some people can do. It sends a message, it gets noticed outside the organization, and it lets objective news reporting share your motivation, which would normally fall under opinion.
      It also leaves a big gap in the organization that isn’t getting anything done.

    • 🇨🇦 holdstrong@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      DOGE is a restructuring of the existing US Digital Service. The people leaving are mostly people who worked there before Elon took over.

  • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I would love to see posts like this end up on right leaning spaces like critical posts about left leaning issues end up on left leaning spaces.

    Trumps base has such a sycophant army that they just swarm spaces and post this stuff every minute of every day. But the opposite doesn’t happen. Having even 100 people posting stuff like this across their space would do more than a 10 000 person protest ever could but it amazes me that 10 000 would take time off work, go stand in the rain for a week instead of shit posting effectively.

    • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, but right leaning spaces block people critical of the right. Just look at the cesspool that is /r/conservative

      • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        So does left spaces but they get through by their conviction to have every random base member spread it. The left is literally asleep

    • LotrOrc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If all people did was post things online then there is no chance in hell anything would change.

      • Seasm0ke@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        That was trumps entire campaign strategy. Dems mocked them for their online spend and now look. GamerGate, YouTube ads, Swarmfront and 4Chan have shaped the internet discourse to be right leaning on nearly every popular platform. I hate to admit it but shitposting did created change. The alt right pipeline radicalized young men into trump voters.

    • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is based on the faulty liberal assumption that fascists are only fascists because they have yet to be shown all of the facts and logic.

      Let’s just speed run the scenario where you post this article on a right space: you post the article, every trumper comes out and says the resignations were good because the staffers were woke, and then you scratch your head wondering why your appeal to facts and logic didn’t work on fascists. At this point you might just start spamming right spaces and have all your posts go directly to spam.

      It’s honestly kind of disturbing how you write off actual protests in favor of online activism, and I couldn’t think of a more liberal take tbh. Anyone, at this stage of the game, who is taking the position of “less protests, more…” should be evaluated extremely critically - especially if your alternative is spamming r/conservative with liberal thinkpieces.

  • Bosht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    HOLY SHIT HELL YES!! Finally someone with some backbone god damn. Best news I’ve heard in a month!

  • rustydrd@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Relevant bit from the article, because some of y’all apparently comment before reading:

    The staffers who resigned were all originally employees of the United States Digital Service, a technology unit established during President Obama’s second term in 2014. The unit was renamed and reorganized in January via executive order by Trump into the Musk-headed DOGE.

    • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I have seen some news sites giving this with headlines like “DOGE Goons resign” without the part you just quoted of course. top notch newsmanship

    • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      My understanding is: Founding a new Department can only be done by Congress, so they had to “redefine” (more like corrupt) an existing one.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, they renamed it to DOGE, presumably because using the term duke would be off putting to their drone followers. Then they gave the organization a fuck ton more authority and ignored judicial rulings. What does any of it have to do with Obama though?

      • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It has nothing to do with Obama. Is that a trigger word for you or something? It’s because of comments like this.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Trigger word? I was asking why they are trying to tie an authoritarian move to a president who left office in the way a democratic Republic set up over 2 terms ago.

          Have fun with your buzzwords.