• Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    That’s four of them. I rather think Carter was a good human being, regardless of whether or not you think he was a good president.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I can’t really agree with that given how he treated Cambodia and supported the Khmer Rouge, as well as other crimes against humanity in the name of “opposing Communism.”

      • TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s sad how lacking of recent historical context people have. They always point to Carter and it’s like… frustrating.

        • Dengalicious@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          The truth is that they want to see non-white people killed. They support Carter because he supported groups like the Khmer Rouge and they killed Vietnamese people. It’s just racism at its core

      • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Yeah but if you ignore some of the most heinous atrocities ever perpetrated he’s a nice guy

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          George W. Bush’s treatment by the media in recent years in a nutshell. Thank goodness for Blowback reminding people of his atrocities.

  • lugal@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    “Fun fact”: Mount Rushmore or Six Grandfathers was a sacred mountain for the Lakota to actively disrespect their beliefs

  • MasterBlaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Okay, fella - take a few breaths and relax. People are products of their times. The better ones fight for virtues and values they see as better at the time. They see an opportunity others do not and rally people around those.

    Others they don’t see and continue wi5h those norms, or they see the wrongs but don’t believe they can rally people around fixing them.

    Do not demonize people in the past who do not meet current norms. There will never be anybody who will meet those standards.

    Judge them against the standards of their peers.

    What if MLK did not support feminists? Would he now be considered scum, thus negating everything good he ever did?

    Heck, i don’t know if he had a stance on women’s rights explicitly. Maybe he didn’t. Is he evil if he didn’t?

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      There were plenty of peers, even UK and European ones, that opposed the US colonial project. Read Losurdo - Liberalism, a counter-history if you want an in-depth look at the debates of the time.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Do not demonize people in the past who do not meet current norms. There will never be anybody who will meet those standards.

      “Nazis were just a product of their time!”

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, nobody at that time knew slavery was wrong. Well, I mean, except for all the slaves, obviously, they knew, but there was no way for them to get their perspective heard because they were cut out of the political process. Who cut them out of the process? Well, uh, well you see…

    • dwindling7373@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      People are products of their times.

      You hear this a lot, but then you and look at “the times” and find arguments in favor of cultural integration dating back thousand of years.

      It is true that people are the products of their time, but those times are not as radically distant moral wise as it is usually assumed.

    • taiyang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Product of the times isn’t a great way to put it, but you can certainly make the argument that most people have shades of grey morality.

      Science can back you up, too, as I teach social psychology and when you dig in, you find that normative human nature is pretty complex but generally very supportive for in-group and mildly empathetic even with strangers. It’s only when you dehumanize a group do you get the worst behavior, and in all four cases you see that, be it slaves or indigenous people.

      When you look at those times, it’s people who recognized their humanity that ended up in the just side of history.

    • yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Okay. There were staunch abolitionists across the US and especially in the UK. Many of whom were operating on the basis of equality, i.e. not the American belief that black people are a subspecies that were sent from heaven to serve whites, like all the leaders of the US though before the 1900s.

      So by your own method, Washington was a disgusting human being, one would argue a demon.

      • stickly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        There are people today rightly pointing out the looting of the global South by the global North, and yet nobody in the north is volunteering to give it all back. What disgusting human beings, if they had any decency they’d give it back and ritually kill themselves

        • yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          That line only works when most of the global north aren’t more poor than those in the south.

          Most people in the western world do want to remove the stolen wealth and return it, since they’ve never seen it either.

          • stickly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            ??? Do they really though? I rarely see the sentiment that literally all ill-gotten gains forming the foundation of their nation’s power and stability should be returned (and definitely not from people benefitting). Mostly it’s just tossing a few cultural artifacts, some meager reparations, and cutting back on some luxury like chocolate because it makes them feel bad. That’s the same as freeing a few slaves after you profit off them for your whole life (and we established that makes you a demon).

            Or are you arguing about injustices in classes? If everyone being exploited by the rich agreed to dismantle that system it would be done by now. Doesn’t matter if you’re poor, you participate in the problem.

            You probably just want your exploitation to be marginally less than the guys on the bottom, you don’t care about the core issue. Therefore being opposed to the compete dismantling of our current economic system is regressive and 90% of earth’s population are demons

        • MasterBlaster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Perhaps I’m not seeing the sarcasm in this. The level of hatred one has to have for a whole population to genuinely want them all killed in disgrace reminds me of something that happened in recent history several times… hmm… what could that be? Cambodia, Serbia, Germany… hmm.

          Mighty high horse there. Got a mirror? Consider using it.

      • MasterBlaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Really? You think because people existed who held our view of what is right means all who did not have an epiphany, and whole-heartedly agree, are horrible subhuman beings?

        • yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          That humans are human?

          Yeah, I’m willing to draw the line in the sand there. Equality in the face of nobility (i.e. class vs race based discrimination) is more fair and equal than the view espoused by our founding fathers. But all caste systems have always been bad. Universally. And no matter the culture or time period with this idea, you’ll find a loud minority or a large majority of people that disagree with the caste system in place.

          Because that’s how they work, a minority can only benefit, and are the only ones that need it to work, so the less stratified they are the more people are against it but are rendered powerless by the system in place.

          Every human that didn’t believe in equality, and by that I just mean that all humans are human, is a bad person.

          For fucks sake orangutans got their name because we as a species treated them as human at one point. If we can do that to a fucking monkey there’s no epiphany needed to do it to actual humans.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      What if MLK did not support feminists? Would he now be considered scum, thus negating everything good he ever did?

      he literally addressed the national organization for women in 1966 and espoused their ideals.

      giving a pass to the people from history is problematic because the same ideals of progressiveness that we pride ourselves on today were present in the past and people knew that it existed; they simply weren’t as popular back then as they are now and anyone espousing them back then were treated like tankies of their own time.

      giving them a pass only helps to excuse regressivism and anti-progressive sentiment like both the republicans and democrats (respectively) practice today; this is a key reason why we have trump as president today and probably jd vance tomorrow.

      • MasterBlaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Excellent job taking what I wrote and reframing it to make it appear i asserted something I did not.

        Reading the room, I can see this forum is filled with people who have an axe to grind and have already decided I am a “part of the problem” because I had the audacity to suggest that we should not demonize the American founders.

        Good luck finding a nation that has any redeeming qualities, given that no founders are unimpeachable for anything.

        • eldavi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          you’re missing the point and no nation’s founder’s character is unassailable.

          we give grand canyon sized passes to these specific founders to white wash their truly horrific behaviors (that we know about); but don’t do the same thing for founders that we consider our enemies and that’s indicative of the propaganda that we keep perpetuating when we repeat this whitewashing to each other; as well as the reason why we’re descending into fascism.

          no one is immune to propaganda so, yes, you are part of the problem like i am; the only difference is that me along with most of the people commenting on this post are aware of this specific propaganda and you’re not; hopefully unwittingly so.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    You could look at any country in the world and find leaders that were just as bad and even worse throughout history. I think the takeaway should be that shitty people exist. Some of it is a product of the times, some of it just being awful people. Shitty people have and always will exist.

  • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is why I find it surprising when USAians say “This is not us.” When talking about Trump. No bro, it was always you, maybe you just weren’t paying attention.

    • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Me sowing: Hell yeah this is great

      Me reaping: This is not us. What a somber moment in world history 😔

    • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      As a Native American this attitude is so grating. People outside the US really don’t seem to understand that it’s 55 different states, districts, and territories, along with dozens of sovereign tribes, all being forced to pretend to be one nation. Many of us can and do claim “this is not us” in the same way many Europeans would say the same about Viktor Orban.

      • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        States, districts, territories are not the same as different countries. Viktor Orban is not an European leader same as Jagmeet Singh is not an American leader.

      • piratekaiser@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I can’t and don’t want to argue with your point, however in the faceless internet space unless you specify you speak from the name of a specific subgroup, the blanket ‘American’ is implied. It’s not a lack of understanding, it’s a lack of context.

        Contrary to that Europe doesn’t have one cohesive identity, your example of Orban is multiple country borders removed from me personally. I don’t have the power to vote for/against him or influence that country in any way, where that’s different in your case.

        • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m not sure why you would reply if you didn’t want to argue but okay.

          Thinking that individual European countries have local identities and states or others don’t is absolutely a lack of understanding and not a lack of context.

          That you seem to think that everyone in the US has the power to vote for or against the president would also seem to be a lack of understanding, I chose the leader of a specific country in Europe as my example for that reason.

          • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            If you don’t have the power to vote for the president, you don’t live in a democracy.

          • piratekaiser@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Thinking that individual European countries have local identities and states or others don’t is absolutely a lack of understanding and not a lack of context.

            That’s not at all what I said. It’s in fact the opposite and because of that I said I can’t argue with most of your previous points.

            On your latter point, I do lack some understanding on the native reservations, but as far as I know they’re still under the governance of the US to some extent. My assumption was they can at least participate in the ‘democracy’ which affects them immensely. It’s very sad that’s not the case…

        • Mossy Feathers (She/Her)@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah, uh, last I checked American territories don’t have the ability to vote in federal elections. Someone from Puerto Rico can’t vote for the US president despite being governed by the US. It’s one of many bullshit systems designed to keep the GOP-Democrat right-wing ratchet going.

          Contrary to that Europe doesn’t have one cohesive identity, your example of Orban is multiple country borders removed from me personally.

          Orban would probably be best compared to a state governor. Just a reminder that Texas is literally larger than the largest EU country with some space leftover for a city-state or two.

          The idea that the US has a cohesive identity is just… unbelievably ignorant. I’m actually amazed that you believe that considering that no one in their right mind would say the same thing about places like Africa, Europe, or South America.

    • Mossy Feathers (She/Her)@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I didn’t have a choice to be born here, and, had I had the option, I wouldn’t have defaced a Native American monument in the first place. This is on top of the fact that the US is currently trying to find ways of disowning/executing me (trans).

      Quite honestly, maybe I shouldn’t be offended by being lumped in with other Americans, because maybe I’m not actually being included in these kinds of sweeping statements. However, it rubs me the wrong way when people imply that Americans as a whole are responsible for the things our government has and is doing.

      Again, I didn’t ask to be born in the US. I don’t like that I’m “American”. No one asked me, please don’t lump people like me in with the others.

    • taiyang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I mean, in so much as a single person representing a county goes. The first colonies were a mix of religious zealots, Virginian drug dealers (well, tobacco but that’s almost worse), and a little Dutch (who were quite active in slave trading at the time). Quickly got a few more from French and Spanish, too.

      However, the US also includes annexed Mexican territory (which has its own mixed history of subjegation and torture) and slews of different immigrant populations (with their own mixed intentions). A section of my own family is here cause they tried for Scottish independence, although there’s a good chance they were sent here for being belligerent drunks.

      That said, ain’t a single country on this earth without their fair share of bullshit. America is just a lovely mix of those assholes, honestly.

        • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I think it’s tremendously funny that you saw a list including Stalin, Putin, and Mao, and your only response was "I’ve never seen anyone defend Pol Pot.

          Proves my point, there are plenty of leaders that users of this instance think were good people.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    All four of them carved onto a sacred natural site known to the Plains Indigenous people of the area as the ‘Six Grandfathers’

  • remotelove@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The history of Washingtons teeth is uncertain. The evidence that those were slave teeth seems to show that the teeth were purchased.

    Internet pictures with words are fucking dumb.

    • jsomae@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I was at the museum at his estate on the potomac; the dentures were there. The plaque underneath claimed it was slaves.

      • stickly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Is that not how dentures worked at the time? Any tooth you got was from someone so poor they had to sell it or who had it taken from them.

        Modern equivalent would be displaying shoes made in a sweatshop. Yeah terrible practice, but so commonplace its generally not a huge reflection on the character of the owner.

      • remotelove@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Both conditions apply, was the intent. Teeth from slaves that were also purchased. My wording was unclear, sorry.

        It was so unclear, it seems that I am white washing racist now.

        • hime0321@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          it seems that I am white washing racist now

          Me too, when I called out their childish behavior.

      • remotelove@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Lulz, good points. I should clarify that internet pictures with “facts” are fucking dumb. While that wording has gaps as well, maybe we can hone in on some specificity.

    • lath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Washington’s teeth were made of diamonds and you can’t convince me otherwise.

    • Spectre@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Washington owned slaves. He was not some moral high ground individual. The only reason why they even got independence from Britain was that Britain wanted to stop the expansion of the territory and the people in the colonies wanted to continue it and kill all the natives.

      • remotelove@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I didn’t suggest anything about his character, and we could probably have an entirely separate discussion about imperialism.

        What is important is how you source information when it comes to dental prosthetics.

        • Spectre@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Oh please, criticizing the meme because “the teeth were bought” Is an attempt to save his caharacter. And then saying that images with words are all dumb. People can see through your attempt of white washing.

          • remotelove@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I don’t give a fuck about his character.

            You are making assumptions about my intent or what I believe, which is a childish argument tactic.

            Again, internet pictures with words are fucking dumb. You might get a ton of likes on Facebook with that shit though.

            • Spectre@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Go on a seethe, cope calling me childish or whatever your manipulation tactic is, but your attempt of white washing is obvious. I am done talking to you.

              • remotelove@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                Lulz, wut? I called your discussion style childish and you literally just did the same thing again.

                I could make all kinds of assumptions about your intents, and none of them good. But I don’t.

              • hime0321@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                I only see one person coping and seething. Dude has criticism about a meme because the source is questionable and you just bitch and moan. You literally put word in their mouth.

                • Spectre@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Lmao, “questionable source”, you can literally Google that in 5 seconds and see all the sources that confirm that. Now I know that memes are supposed to have sources when the users can easily Google it themselves /s. The white washing apologist just get funnier and funnier.

      • lath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Wow that’s such a dumb thing I didn’t expect to read today. I can see why you would think so, but still… Wow.

    • cheers_queers@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m 30 and this is the first I’ve ever heard about this. my southern Baptist homeschool curriculum told me that his teeth were made of wood and it was never something i thought to fact check as an adult.

      gotta love homeschooling 🙄

  • Thepotholeman@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I mean sure, the ruling men of more then a century ago by our standards were terrible people. But goddamn teddy Roosevelt was a man fighting for shit you’re still fighting for today and hell he got you closer to it then compared to you now… You can lump him in with slave owners and child rapists FFS.

  • bricklove@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Not pictured: the giant, shitty looking pile of rubble under them.

    They just blasted chunks off the mountain and left the mess behind

    • Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      My wife and I found ourselves near Mt. Rushmore by happenstance durin a road trip several years back. We knew the history, but stopped in to see it for ourselves. We found it to be extremely shitty and underwhelming. The natural area behind the monument was incredible, and I absolutely understand why the indigenous people believed this place to be sacred, but the front was small, tacky, and depressing. I wish I could refund our admission and give it to some chill natives at a gas station instead.

  • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s easy to pick on “the levels of bad”, when you’re not the one one enslaved in a priaon, but writing behind a screen.

  • ErsatzCoalButter@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    William Henry Harrison should have ate it at Tippecanoe but at least he corrected his misstep during his first month in office