• Kroxx@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I love the “but it pays for schools” argument, like how about we drop 3 less bombs per year and just pay for all the schools out of the existing tax pool like it should be.

    • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      property tax is more equitable than sales tax because it is based on wealth instead of consumption.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Using property tax to fund education simply leaves poor areas poor and uneducated.

        Now if they restructured it so the property tax went to the state level and was distributed to those schools that needed it most, not those schools that were in proximity of the land, I’d be for it.

    • Damionsipher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes and. How most of the US funds their school system is super fucked up. Here in Canada, primary education is paid for by the province, and school funding is based on student enrollment numbers. This translates to much more equal levels of education, regardless of how wealthy a given neighborhood may be. I was shocked to find out that schools are paid for by catchment area taxes in must of the states - it makes the history of redlining so obvious when the is literally a “wing side of the tracks”.