Summary
AP reporter Josh Boak clashed with White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt over Trump’s tariff policy, which she called “a tax cut for the American people.”
Boak challenged her claim: “I’m sorry, have you ever paid a tariff? Because I have. They don’t get charged on foreign companies, they get charged on importers,” Boak said.
Leavitt accused him of questioning her economic knowledge and later regretted calling on AP.
The tense exchange highlights ongoing White House-AP tensions, as a federal judge prepares to hear AP’s legal challenge over press access on March 20.
The other day my mom asked me “wouldn’t you rather pay tariffs than income taxes?” I’m in the bottom percent of tax payers and she’s even worse off. I still haven’t responded.
Income taxes are relative to your own income. Tariffs don’t give a shit about your income or your ability to pay them.
We’re still paying income taxes.
Seems like an easy, non-confrontational response.
I actually haven’t responded because I just think she’s so stupid for even saying that and have nothing much to say to her without being mean
Sometimes, you gotta be a little mean.
And sometimes you have to double down when they aren’t listening.
Leavitt accused him of questioning her economic knowledge
Which is none. Her degree is in communications and politics which she got while riding a softball scholarship. She was a press writer for Trump’s first term, worked as a communications director for Elise Stefanik during the interim, and now she is Press Secretary. None of that is fucking economics. She has zero fucking knowledge of how fucking economics works, that’s just stating fucking fact. When it comes to economics she is a fucking idiot.
It’s not even a fucking question. Josh Boak has worked in DC economics reporting since 2013, he literally has more economic knowledge in his left pinky fingernail than that stupid fuckface has in her entire fucking life. That is just FACT.
later regretted calling on AP
Because she is a thin skinned bitch. She absolutely cannot stand that people could possibly know MORE than her dumb fucking softball is about as good as it is ever going to get for her, ass could ever know. She’s just a fucking idiot, that’s all there is to it.
Yes you fucking idiot, yes, Boak knows more by measures larger than stellar bodies are measured, about economics than you. For a White House that gets up in arms about DEI hires, holy shit I dare someone to explain her dumbass.
This context is so important!
When called out on your lies, and you are unable to prove otherwise, you should concede your argument. But I suppose the point wasn’t to be truthful.
I dare someone to explain her dumbass
I mean, she is blonde.
… What kind of boomer ass joke is that?
I think it’s funny not in the “dumb blonde” way, but the “Trump prefers blondes, so DEI hires will be young attractive blonde white women now” way.
At least they are not hiring kids for the same reason.
Sir, your prose is sublime.
“I now regret letting a real reporter show how stupid I am, and how stupid I think the American people are.”- Dumb Reich Barbie.
This is the person whose tweet they directly spilled the beans was directly referenced by the judge as the reason an induction was placed on Trump’s spending freeze order.
Well he won’t be allowed back in the press room anytime soon.
Yeah that is true. It’s good to see someone call out the lies when they happen though.
Man people are dumb, for those that still think this is a good idea here is the logic. Tariffs increase the price to bring in goods to a country, the supplier will typically add this additional price increase and charge it back onto the buyer to absorb. Meaning the buyer will see an increase.
Now let’s say Trump is doing this to bring production back to the States, in order to be successful you need to keep costs down as low as possible. This is also the reason alot of countries sent their production overseas because it’s cheaper (wages for example). So in order for the US to even begin competing with production giants like China and keep costs down means workers in the US have to get used to the idea of China style wages and work conditions. Hence Trumps reasoning for giving more power back to companies so that in X years US becomes the new production hub. But the pain to get there is going to be astronomical for the US. Feel free to add or point out any illogical thought processes in my opinion.
Mind you, bringing production back to the US will never lower costs, completely regardless of the fact that labor and environmental compliance is more costly. All tariffs do is set a price floor for imported products that domestic supplies now only have to match.
This comment sounds completely in line with reality lol. Weird reading something like that in these times.
I don’t think it’s just the pain to get there. It’s also painful just being there for the lower class.
Which is everyone below the top 30%. They’re eliminating the middle class.
Top 1% or less, more likely.
Is the real way to stick it to Canada (and others) is set a limit on the amount of product they can export to the US?
Well…
First off, why do you want to stick of to Canada. They, by and large, have been good neighbors to the US. The only people who get angry at Canada are usually Canadians.
That aside, limiting imports limits supply, likely increasing prices for whatever product has been limited. It’s not that different from the tariffs, as far as the consumer is concerned. The big difference is that it sets up a first mover benefit for the exporters/importers (if you get your whole supply across before the cutoff, you get to sell all of it, whereas later sellers might only be able to get part of their supply across. Faster companies benefit from this, to unknown effect.) as opposed to a capital/demand limit from the tariffs. (higher tariffs require higher prices, which often prices out some amount of people who would buy the item. Importers can try to narrow their unit margin or spend capital to sell more slowly. Companies with more capital can find it easier to afford either/both.)
