Super cool. Would AGPL fix the issues with the loop holes they used?
Well, in that case, maybe this is interesting to you. I ran a user survey last year for my instance and anyone else wanting to answer and one question was age. Here’s the age group graph:
The y-axis is number of respondents, x-axis is age group. Obviously this only applies to the people that responded to the survey and thus might not apply in general to the fediverse, but it’s probably an indication. And, well, it’s mostly smoothly distributed without any major gaps or humps (slight hump at 30-34 but not sure if that’s statistically significant).
It’s inherently an american concept, which is what also annoys me as some Europeans have started importing the concept even though it makes little sense (I don’t really think it makes sense in the US either but the fact that it is imported is just extra stupid).
I think people just love putting other people in boxes. Consider people complexly instead.
If you ask me, these generation labels are bullshit and just a way to put people into a stereotypical box and make them an “other”. Not much better than astrology.
No problem 😇
Also the second one is lighter on the reading and has more character dialog and such, so definitely play that too!
The language existed long before the foundation. The foundation is purely there to support the language.
4 mod 1, hold da op. Var sådan en voldsom anholdelse virkelig nødvendig?
Progress!
Jeg elsker når det regner udenfor, det er hyggeligt bare at kigge ud af vinduet :)
Jeg kan vel tikke 2 ud af 4 (1 og 4) af :P bedre end ingenting
The Rust Foundation very deliberately does not control the development of Rust. There has been issues with the moderation team in the past but I think they’re actually resolved today. And let me just assure you that Rust is not the only language project with problems and the fact that they have been talked about and discussed in the open and resolved is a sign of maturity and trust, not a bad thing.
In the game, you’ll find various philosophical texts. These are entirely optional and serve as a kind of background set and things to think about. So you can just not read them if you don’t want to or find them boring. I’m guessing when you say you don’t enjoy philosophy, you’d find it boring to read those texts, so just skip them.
You’ll also find snippets of other texts that aren’t philosophical that give clues to the story. These can also be skipped but you’ll miss out on a significant chunk of the story then. There are other story bits that require no reading so you’ll still get an idea of it and might still get the gist mostly.
But you can play just the puzzles and not worry about the philosophical background or the story at all. They actually deliberately designed the game this way so that you can enjoy the puzzles alone if that’s your jam 🙂. The puzzles are very good so even if you just want some good puzzles, I’d still recommend it.
Hvordan kan det være vi arbejder mere end tidligere? Hvor lang tid tilbage er “tidligere”? Siger bogen noget om det?
Virker rimeligt og de fleste er vist enige, regel 2 er opdateret.
It really depends on the specifics of the fight and the person (neurotypical or not). Perhaps some couple counselling with a professional would be helpful to understand each other better?
Sounds like a useful cool feature, would love to see it in Lemmy too.
Denmark is super flat. I believe the highest point is the pylons of the bridge between the two Major islands, Funen and Zealand.
En del af det er nok at man er mere opmærksom på det, men jeg tror ikke det kan forklare det helt.
Elefanten i rummet er sociale medier og iPad-opdragelse, hvis du spørger mig.
Hits a bit too close to home