I had to try this out loud, those are too many letters for so little syllables. But it does work.

So, Sir, you’re trying to tell me the deer that’s lodged into your grill was already dead and “floated” into the road. Sure. Let’s go down to the station for an extended drug screening.

I will never be able to read a sentence starting like that without Gabe yelling at andy as my inner voice

Reminds me of the humanity spirits in the dark souls DLC

I will never understand how ruining someones life because they are using drugs is supposed to help them get off of drugs.

Edit: don’t get me wrong, it’s great that this has been researched, but it seems so obvious.

That’s not the issue and you are failing to understand that. I agree with you. But the first comment said that that is the same form and level of consent needed that is needed for sex and that’s just not true.

No. I reacted to someone claiming that hearing about sex needs the hearing parties consent, the same as sex needs consent which I don’t agree with.

Talking about sex needs to be done with some caution to not upset others, like many other topics. It’s different from the consent needed for engaging in sexual activities with someone.

That includes triggering survivors who may not have expected you to violate social norms and who would have told you, “hey, I don’t like talking about sex in front of people because I get panic attacks.”

That’s true but that’s also true for any number of topics. This is a general “how/when do I talk about potentially triggering topics” issue and has nothing to do with sexual consent.

The foundation of every activity people do together is consent. That doesn’t mean I need the consent of everyone in the room to talk about something.

The second paragraph has my full support, the first one seems weird to me.

The people that get 80k aren’t the ones responsible for the fact that most make less than that. It’s the ones that own shit. You know, the rich. Antagonizing each other won’t help anyone have a better life, we can only get a better life for everyone if we recognise that.

Advocating violence because you’re a fucking edgy social justice warrior who thinks everyone should eat the rich (even tho you’re likely making more money than the average US worker anyway!) is total bullshit.

Tell me you don’t understand how class solidarity works without telling me you don’t understand how class solidarity works

I certainly hope someone thinks that’s the case

On an unrelated note, I can’t quit my job because I don’t want to lose my health insurance there…

Didn’t expect accurate yet sarcastic commentary on the state of our society in a thread about raccoons being cute idiots