• octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    It’s like these people (edit- republican voters) have never read a book in their lives.

    By about age 12 I had a reasonable grasp of our nation’s checks and balances, a cornerstone of our democracy.

    At a minimum you’d think a rabid conservative fanbase that claims to love the constitution would be aware of this, and possibly expect the politicians they voted for to uphold such core principles.

    That would require Republicans and US Conservatives to have actual ethics and principles beyond making sure they create the most unwelcoming world possible for anyone not white, straight, male, cis, and Christian.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s like these people have never read a book in their lives.

      JD Vance has a law degree from Yale.

      https://www.politico.com/blogs/new-hampshire-primary-2016-live-updates/2016/02/republican-debate-marco-rubio-obama-knows-what-hes-doing-218877

      "Let’s dispel with this fiction that Barack Obama JD Vance doesn’t know what he’s doing,” the Florida senator I said. “He knows exactly what he’s doing. He’s trying to change this country.”

      Thanks for letting me crib you, Marco Rubio, you fucking buffon, because yeah. JD Vance literally has a degree in this field so he knows unequivocally what the truth actually is. He knows exactly what he’s doing.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JD_Vance#Early_life,_military_service,_and_education

      Vance then attended Yale Law School, where he was a member of The Yale Law Journal

      as Vance was about to graduate from Yale with a Juris Doctor degree.

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m not surprised Vance knows what he’s doing.

        I’m surprised the people who voted for him don’t, especially given how often I see a Trump sticker paired with a “We the People” window tint.

          • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Unfortunately, simply reading the constitution without any knowledge of how to parse legal language or any background knowledge about major Supreme Court decisions will leave the average person more confused than informed.

            So I don’t doubt that people read it, but there is a reason that law school isn’t simply reciting the constitution.

            While the average voter may be ignorant… JD Vance absolutely knows better, he doesn’t get to hide behind claims of ignorance or confusion.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Which is why he’s deliberately choosing ambiguous and non-binding language in this tweet. If questioned later (I presume at the Hague) he can then say “well, I said ‘command’ not ‘rule’ so I wasn’t speaking about actual legal rulings, just you know, like when a judge tells someone to do something, not a ruling in a courtroom…”

      Fucker knows how seditious this is so he’s riding the line.

  • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The courts need to start deputizing large numbers of bailiffs to enforce their orders. Forget relying on funding from Congress for it; I’m sure they’ll have plenty of volunteers. Musk and his goons refuse to comply with court orders? Haul them into court at the point of a bayonet. I’m sure you’ll have no shortage of patriotic Americans also willing to donate weapons to arm these new bailiffs.

    The courts need to seriously build out their capacity to enforce orders independent of the executive branch. They need muscle.

    • Jerkface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Today, the primary responsibilities of U.S. Marshals include protecting federal judges and witnesses, transporting federal prisoners, apprehending federal fugitives, and managing assets seized from criminal enterprises.

      Oh, sweet.

      The President, with the advice and consent of the Senate, appoints U.S. Marshals for a 4-year term.

      Oh. Oh no.

      https://www.gao.gov/assets/a91787.html#:~:text=The President%2C with the advice,for a 4-year term.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Whoa now, that’s a bit reactionary.

      The reason for the shit show is that it’s all based on good faith. And if a power hungry dictator tries to control the executive…well, the legislative is supposed to keep him in check.

      It’s also based on the presumption that the people wouldn’t willingly elect, let alone re-elect, a blatantly corrupt president and Congress that enables them…or at least have few enough bad ones to be able to break party lines and put a stop to it.

      Ideally, enough Republicans on Congress would have enough of a spine to actually put country before party and stop this shit. Start impeaching judges and presidents. Don’t let anything else get done.

      Nope. They all sold out on their party. Fucking despicable. Not even worth spitting on.

      I can’t wait till someone spills the beans on whatever kompromat or bribes or imperius curse has got such a tight grip on the party.

  • Demdaru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Wait. Isn’t there military side of court that does literary this? And what’s more, it has access to heavier penalties because military can be more heinous?

  • Schlemmy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    He’s not wrong. A judge can rule if there’s a trial and that judge will always have to apply the law.

  • rational_lib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    If you were to try to drive someone else’s car, that would be illegal
    If you were to try to command a bank teller to give you money, that’s also illegal
    Vice Presidents aren’t allowed to fuck couches.

  • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Vance, being a lawyer, knows which words have meaning.

    That’s why he wrote ‘tell’ ‘command’ and ‘control’ instead of ‘rules’ ‘orders’ or ‘directs’.