• Meltdown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Can you give a single example of an ancient historian describing her as sexy? All the sources I’ve seen focus on her skills and realpolitik rather than her beauty.

  • breecher@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Nah, it is the other way around. Historians would say those facts, and Hollywood and possibly general media would be the ones saying “sexy”.

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    'Cos the romans were so fucked up they literally could not handle being out maneuvered, outsmarted, outstrategised by a woman. So they framed it as “pussy pass”

    • FearMeAndDecay@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Wasn’t she actually considered not super attractive at the time? Like not necessarily ugly, but she wasn’t being mistaken for Venus incarnate. It was only later on that the idea of her being super hot because popular right?

      • Lucky_777@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Powerful women are sexy! Dont need to be crazy hot when you can whisper in my ear, the language of a people you just steam rolled.

      • Taleya@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        plutarch and cassius dio emphasise the personality, wit, intelligence, charm etc etc…cicero went total piers morgan though lolol

  • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I agree all those things are hot as f.

    Talk to me more stabilization of the region baby in any of those 9 languages.

  • MusicSoulEdu@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I do find it hilarious that we associate sexiness with Cleopatra because of an intensive smear campaign.

    • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      She probably was legitimately attractive by Roman cultural norms and almost certainly leveraged that when dealing with Rome. The smear campaign was more playing that aspect up while downplaying the fact she was a genuine once-in-a-generation genius than making up things about how sexy she was.

  • addie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Nothing to me says ‘sexy’ quite like your grandad and your great-grandad being the same guy, or your (great * 5)-grandmother / grandfather being one man and woman, when most people have that responsibility spread between 64 people.

    Close family. Must have made Christmas easy - having the in-laws round isn’t so bad when they’re your own blood relatives too.

    • Iceman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Small domino: Greek bloodline fuckery.

      Middle Domino: Hollywood.

      Big domino: Incest porn.

    • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Yeah I can’t remember the reasoning / evidence but I do remember reading that Cleopatra was unlikely to have been beautiful or “sexy”. IIRC it’s indeed because she was likely to have congenital deformities due to inbreeding - much like those of Tutankhamen.

      She was extraordinary powerful, well educated, and had a terrifying intellect. Additionally she would have bathed daily which would have been alluring in that era.

      That said, there’s no shortage of other powerful Egyptian babes, Nefertiti and Hatshepsut come to mind.

      Edit: Plutarch the Roman historian said something diplomatic like physical beauty is not her most striking feature. Which, when talking about a ruler, is saying she’s ugly.