• MisanthropiCynic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Or maybe we won’t vote for a democrat or a republican either one so a non vote isn’t a vote your way

  • PixelPilgrim@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    As a stien voter. I pretty much laugh at people that complain about Democrats loss. Yeah Democrats suck I don’t vote for them because I don’t want them to be legitimized. Also I push for approval voting system

  • MellowYellow13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    This dumbass argument again.

    You need an opposition party then. If you keep blaming the voters you are going to keep digging your own grave. In America you have only two parties and legit no opposition party. In this way guess what, FASCISM always wins.

    Also Please honestly explain to me, how in the fuck is fascism lite ever going to beat fascism?

    • AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Bro, DSA leaders have flat out said that that is too much fucking work. They could have a seat at the table, but that comes with the expectation that they will sit down, and in good faith, do some fucking work. But they don’t want a seat at the table. They want to be handed the table, all the chairs, and the keys to the building table is sitting in, and then thanked for saving the world without having to lift a goddamn finger. Obama spoke very openly about his time in office, and said that in his first year he was full of fire and optimism, and was all gung-ho about getting Americans universal healthcare or at least get us on the path to it, and very quickly learned how to be pragmatic. He never gave up his ideals, never changed his values, but in his first year he learned that he couldn’t just magically sign a paper and boom, everyone’s on Medicare. He had to do stuff that most DSA people find boring or tedious, like sitting down with Senators and Representatives and working on a plan together to get something started.

  • adm@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    “What are you going to do vote for the facists?”

    –stays home

    “Wait…”

    (In all seriousness, the two party system killed us. The first thing we should have could have fixed was ranked choice voting but they would never mandate that because it would break their hold. Also despite my joke above I did vote but I’m not going to get pissy with someone that didn’t the problem is the party not the voter. Unless they voter actively voted red.)

  • Turret3857@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I voted for Kamala. My parents and grandparents did as well. I do not feel that the democrats were/are doing jack shit to court new voters. The party itself expects to just be the status quo and have people vote for it. Whether people want to admit it or not, the point of being a progressive party is to be… how do I put this… PROGRESSIVE.

    • branno@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Dems didn’t need new voters. They just needed the same folks that voted for Biden in 2020 to show up in 2024.

      Too bad they were too racist and sexist to vote for a black woman.

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Lot of those people who voted in 2020 weren’t Democratic voters. They voted for the Democrats that one time and then the Democrats failed to retain them. That’s on the Democrats. I don’t know how many times people can say it. It’s a candidate and the party’s job to earn people’s votes. Earn them. There is literally no other way to do it. Democrats refuse to do that that’s why they lose.

        • branno@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Here I thought that 4 years of competent leadership, a booming economy, and some significant legislative victories would earn votes.

          Silly me. Clearly the voting populous wanted extreme leftist policies. Explains why Trump won.

          • BakerBagel@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            What world are you living in where you think the economy of the last 4 years has been booming? Every indicator that isn’t the Dow Jones indicates that the economy has been absolutely fucked for the last 4 years.

            • branno@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              The real one?

              Where 6 million more people in the US were employed than before the pandemic.

              Where inflation in the US was lower than that of peer western countries.

              Where the number of people using food stamps decreased.

              Where wages went up almost 20% over 4 years.

              Where GDP grew by some 14% over 4 years.

              Where the S&P 500 increase by 43% over 4 years.

              By what reasonable metric would you consider the economy fucked?

              • BakerBagel@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Have you tried to actually find a job in the last 2 years? It’s almost impossible despite loads of “we’re hiring!” sighns that are offering less than they were 2 years ago

                Most Americans do not care what inflation in the UK or Germany is. They care what it looks like here, and when most Americans were living paycheck to paycheck before Biden took over, inflation hits them even harder.

                Maybe average income has gone up that much the last 4 years, but most people’s income has been essentially flat for the last 4. The majority of Americans make less than $30 an hour, which is inadequate to live on nearly anywhere in the country.

                GDP is great if you have stocks and bonds. It’s meaningless to your average person who is barely able to put anything into a 401(k).

                • Tja@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  So you got 6 different metrics about a good economy and your answer is… that it feels hard to find a job?

                  Like anyone in IT, I get bombarded by offers on LinkedIn and salaries kept growing just fine.

                  The numbers clearly say that more people are employed and less are on food stamps, so it could be that you need to do something about yourself?

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      the point of being a progressive party is to be… how do I put this… PROGRESSIVE.

      Their policies are progressive. They have a voting history proving they vote progressively. Joe Biden was an EXTREMELY progressive president.

      Yeah, the Dems should advertise better. But Americans should also not be braindead stupid assholes and do some goddamn homework.

      We had two options. A fascist regime or something 1 trillion times better. We shit the bed and went with fascism. That’s not the Democrat’s fault. That’s dipshit American’s fault.

      • Turret3857@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah their policies are so progressive that the dick Chaney family endorsed them. Biden was so progressive that as soon as the supreme court repealed Roe v. Wade, he made an EO to protect the rights of women. Oh and of course how can we forget that he made college and vocational schooling free for everyone, and secured the rights of trans Americans to literally just fucking exist.

        oh wait. no wait he didn’t do any of that. in fact I think he might’ve just held up the status quo of the time.

        • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah their policies are so progressive that the dick Chaney family endorsed them.

          Yeah, I’m sure it had nothing to do with Liz Cheney being outed by the Republican party for showing opposition to their cult leader. I’m also sure it had nothing to do with the Cheney family recognizing their party had been taken over by said cult leader and his cult and being pretty upset about the threat that poses the country. I’m sure the Cheney family only endorsed Democrats because they genuinely believe in progressive policies. Lol.

          Biden was so progressive that as soon as the supreme court repealed Roe v. Wade, he made an EO to protect the rights of women.

          HE LITERALLY DID. Trump undid them as soon as he became president because LEGISLATING VIA EO’S IS FUCKING STUPID. The only way to make something stick is via legislating through Congress, and that requires A LOT more sway than Biden and Democrats had in this divisive ass country.

          Oh and of course how can we forget that he made college and vocational schooling free for everyone

          Nope, but he forgave student loans for a shit ton of people despite Republican AND Supreme Court obstruction at every turn.

          You need to understand that YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM. You clearly have ZERO clue what you’re talking about, and yet here you are, spreading misinformation on the internet. And, judging by your upvotes, people are taking your misinformation at face value, thus perpetuating the spread of misinformation, leading us to where we are now.

          Do your homework before you post, or don’t post.

          • peregrin5@lemm.eeOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I admire you taking the effort to actually try to educate the dumbos on Lemmy. I’ve long since given up. I just post inflammatory memes and quietly laugh at everyone freaking out.

          • peregrin5@lemm.eeOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Damn. Kudos to you for taking the time to actually educate the dumbos on Lemmy. I’ve long since given up and just get my jollies posting inflammatory memes and silently giggling as they all flip out.

    • peregrin5@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      “I do not feel that the democrats were/are doing jack shit to court new voters.”

      This sentence structure obfuscates your meaning.

        • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          they were not doing Anything

          Their voting history and Biden’s accomplishments disagree with that statement.

          are still not doing Anything.

          They do not control either house of Congress, the presidency, or the Supreme Court. Voters made sure of that.

          • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Neither did the GOP during Obama’s presidency. They still managed to obstruct and block anything of value. Curious isn’t it.

            • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              What’s curious is your lack of understanding of how our government works.

              You’re completely ignoring the fact that Republicans were able to obstruct because they gained House, and then Senate, majority during Obama’s terms. Democrats do not have majority in either chamber of Congress right now. So your comment is senseless.

              Actually, I guess you’re not ignoring. You’re simply unaware, because you don’t know how things work. And yet you’re being upvoted by others who also don’t know how things work.

              EDIT: 6 downvotes as of right now and not a single one of them had the balls or brains to counter what I said. In other words, 6 individuals ignorant of how our government works and completely fine with that. Holy fuck, we really need mandatory civics classes in our schools. So many people with no clue how things work. I guess that’s why a felon rapist traitor is our president.

              • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                They were able to water down the ACA into near uselessness without any majority. At the start it was a Republican vision of healthcare, and they still watered it down because brown man bad. I do understand that they gained power in the midterms which allowed them to do even more obstruction but to claim that Democrats could have just done ANYTHING they wanted because they had the 3 branches is patently false. And yet… Here we are. Dems are largely rolling over and letting the GOP run roughshod over the gov. Not utilizing the abomination of the filibuster for any good, still confirming cabinet members, still treating with traitor and conmen.

              • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                For those keeping score, this isn’t my sockpuppet account. But I feel we could be drinking buddies until we argued about my programming style or something; then it’s war.

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Very, very well put. I voted for Kamala as well, and this is what I’m trying to scream from the rooftops. The democrats seem to see the current populist moment as an excuse to phone it in. It keeps blowing up in the face, and they keep saying “oh well, I guess we need to move right / let the voters learn their lesson”

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Oh yeah, make no mistake, the Dems are fucked.

      It’s just that in '24 we had an option between “continue having a flawed democracy” and “put a literal fascist in power”, and a lot of us are still sore over folks who insisted that choosing the latter was some form of leftism. They weren’t a major force in the general electorate, but here on Lemmy, they were certainly loud, so a lot of bad feeling remains.

      • 野麦さん@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        You clearly don’t understand leftist thought. Voting for a cop, a warmonger and a complicit child-kidnapper is incompatible with many leftists’ beliefs and values. Continued aversion to actually listening to criticisms of the Dems and DNC from the left is why your beloved party is crashing and burning.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          You clearly don’t understand leftist thought.

          No, I absolutely do. They preferred the fascist to working with the dreaded ‘shitlibs’, just like Thalmann.

          Nazi punks fuck off.

          • 野麦さん@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Call me a Nazi all you like, it doesn’t make me a Nazi. In fact, you moralists should take that log out of your eye and actually look at the world your status-quoism has generated

            • PugJesus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Call me a Nazi all you like, it doesn’t make me a Nazi.

              No? You just welcomed in fascism because it pleased your prejudices and preconceptions. Sounds pretty indistinguishable from most Nazis to me.

              In fact, you moralists should take that log out of your eye and actually look at the world your status-quoism has generated

              “Wow, the world is bad. We should make it worse.”

              Brilliant plan. Millions of LGBT Americans and tens of millions of Ukrainians thank you for your ardent support of fascists taking power. I’m sure those dying for lack of supplies from USAID are thrilled as well, as well as poor Americans who can’t afford the massive increases in costs of living and are already living paycheck-to-paycheck, and the crackdown on unions.

              What a brave leftist world you’ve helped create. Maybe if you lick fascist boots a little more, it’ll become even better.

              I also find it amusing that I’m getting called a ‘moralist’ because I advocated the utilitarian option. What fucking insanity.

              • 野麦さん@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Millions of LGBT Americans

                You’re talking to one, and no, the Democrats have backstabbed us at every opportunity. Especially at trans issues, which they love to capitulate on as a bargaining chip for getting their capitalist donors more money.

                Maybe if you lick fascist boots a little more, it’ll become even better.

                If you walk outside and throw a brick in the face of a cop, you can talk to me about what it means to be a bootlicker.

                I also find it amusing that I’m getting called a ‘moralist’ because I advocated the utilitarian option.

                You advocate for action based upon a spook? Sorry, that makes you a moralist. You decided that “maximizing utility” was the moral choice, and that again makes you a moralist. Perhaps you should write a sternly worded lever-pulling manifesto to send to your congressman?

                • PugJesus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  You’re talking to one, and no, the Democrats have backstabbed us at every opportunity. Especially at trans issues, which they love to capitulate on as a bargaining chip for getting their capitalist donors more money.

                  Would you like to remind me about the state of LGBT rights in this country in 2024 compared to 1990?

                  Soaking in fascist circles seems to sap your connection to reality.

                  If you walk outside and throw a brick in the face of a cop, you can talk to me about what it means to be a bootlicker.

                  lmao, you ushered in fascism, bro, and you’re sitting here justifying it besides. Saying “You aren’t attacking enough cops!” to others isn’t going to cure you of your bootlicking position.

                  You advocate for action based upon a spook?

                  Jesus fucking Christ.

                  Sorry, that makes you a moralist. You decided that “maximizing utility” was the moral choice, and that again makes you a moralist.

                  Jesus. Fucking. Christ.

            • PugJesus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Hey, cool, you have ADHD too? We can go to RFK’s concentration camps together. I’m sure our Healing Through Labor™ will be successful.

              • Wren@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Ooooh! Count me in as a qualifying candidate. I’ll drop my Vyvanse off in the bins outside the gates and partake in the Healing Through Labor™ right beside you, my Brother In- wait… what was I just saying?

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The only argument for voting trump while thinking “left” that I can think of, is that all that anger and chaos leads to a big reform of the political landscape where there is a way for a more social system in the end

        But I’d consider that an extremely risky move…

        • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s literally the accelerationist/anti-electoralist religious doctrine. And I say “religious doctrine” because they keep insisting that people will rise up if they assist in the sacrifice of enough LGBTQ+, POC, and other vulnerable people, despite there being absolutely no evidence in history of that ever occurring, even under brutal totalitarian dynasties that lasted hundreds of years.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The party itself expects to just be the status quo and have people vote for it.

      When the alternative was Trump and Project 2025, that’s exactly what most should have voted for.

      But stopping DEI was more important than Social Security for the majority of voters

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I could be wrong about this: But I increasingly feel that the major issue for most of these people was economic instability - not making enough to make ends meet. But, out of a feeling of humiliation around saying “im poor” the message instead targets points of blame; either to potentially spare more dollars for themselves, or just genuinely to lash out at a world that’s succeeding without them.

        Doesn’t make the approach of their message in any way valid or okay. I’m just explaining that they needed an answer to their struggles. Trump gave them an elaborate lie about it, which to them was better than nothing.

      • BakerBagel@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Peope can’t afford their bills and the Democrats were out there saying the economy is stronger than ever. They had no intention of helping people and you are shocked that people didn’t go out to vote. If it’s damned if you do, damned if you don’t, most people will chose the latter

          • BakerBagel@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Only an absolute moron would believe that the economy was better in 2024 than in 2019 for your average person. You can’t blame the poor economy on Biden, but you can absolutely blame the DNC for not spputing off reforms to help people.

            • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              You are one of those who forgot how bad it was. So many millions were in danger of eviction that moratoriums had to be passed.

              • BakerBagel@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Exactly. Moratoriums were passed. Absolutely nothing was done the past 2 years as prices for everything skyrocketed. People remember that sort of thing. Literally the forst thing Biden did was break his promise and give out stimulus checks that were nowhere near what he campaigned on.

                • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  The economy recovered such that people were able to pay their rent despite the increases. Moratoriums ended yet mass evictions didn’t happen. People were doing far better than under Trump.

                • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  He was able to bring inflation down, but the impacts were felt far and wide. As for stimulus checks those were written and voted on by Congress. Congress was Republican during Bidens presidency. He did sign executive orders to speed up the dispersal and to expand SNAP to try to help families. But if the people who fund the stimulus check (Congress) don’t fund it, there is nothing to give out.

        • Petter1@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          They should at least have voted third party… I think many people should have voted third party… Why do so few people vote third party?

          • bishbosh@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            If they are too apathetic to vote for dems, they certainly won’t go out of their way to make a statement and vote third party.

            • Petter1@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Still better than not voting at all. Would not give the same signal if republicans win with 40% of votes VS winning with more than 50% of votes.

              Additionally, if the regular voting base for third parties grows, it exponentially makes more sense voting third party.
              It is like driving backwards away from a really near wall where you parked sideways against it: you have to get just a bit closer to the wall with your nose, but as soon as the tail starts to get away from the wall, the distance grows exponentially faster over time.

              I think best for US would be alternative conservative parties besides republicans.

  • procrastitron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The democrats objectively were wrong.

    They lost the election.

    That’s the only measure of right or wrong that actually matters.

    They literally had only one job and they fucked it up again.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      They literally had only one job and they fucked it up again.

      American voters had one job. To responsibly inform themselves and make the best choice for the welfare of their nation. They failed to do so, again.

      • procrastitron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        We can’t control the American voters so complaining about them doesn’t actually accomplish anything.

        We can, however, change the Democratic party to better align with the voters.

        That should be everyone’s focus.

          • 0ops@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            The dem party is supposed to be the tool to convince the electorate

        • peregrin5@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          “We can, however, change the Democratic party to better align with the voters.”

          Can you though? It’s not for lack of trying but y’all don’t seem to be having much success with this.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Can you though? It’s not for lack of trying but y’all don’t seem to be having much success with this

            What?!

            Ken Martin is a huge win as chair…

            Like, we already changed the party. It happened.

            That’s why I went from constantly shit talking the DNC to promoting it.

            Neoliberals bet everything on Biden/Harris, and now they don’t have control of the DNC anymore.

            The only people who shouldn’t be happy about that is conservatives

          • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            That’s because Democrats are expected to be perfect. Republicans are not.

            Different standards.

            It’s literally WAY easier for Republicans to get votes than Democrats. For a myriad of reasons.

        • 0ops@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          We can’t control the American voters

          If only there was some entity we could donate to that could educate and persuade voters to vote for a progressive candidate via some kind of nationwide campaign…or something.

          Alright I’m being facetious here if it’s not obvious but I agree with you. Whether the blame is placed at the feet of voters or the party (it doesn’t fucking matter as one is supposed to be educating and representing the other), the party is going to need to be the solution.

        • Maiq@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Your comment is both reasonable and reflective.

          The DNC bots have came to lemmy. Like on reddit how they post some BS blaming others for not supporting a candidate that didn’t represent them in the primary and likely wouldn’t have in their office. Then they downvote reasonable criticism to guide the conversation to make it seem like their opinion is the only correct one.

          • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            blaming others for not supporting a candidate that didn’t represent them in the primary and likely wouldn’t have in their office.

            This is irrelevant. On election day you get two options and you have to pick whichever one comes CLOSEST to representing you. A ton of whiny little bitches stayed home or voted 3rd party (pointless) because Democrats didn’t align PERFECTLY with them. That shit ain’t happening in reality. You grow up and pick whoever is CLOSEST.

            • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              because Democrats didn’t align PERFECTLY very well at all with them

              That shit ain’t happening in reality. You grow up and pick whoever is CLOSEST.

              Interesting, because it looks like people chose a different option here in reality. Maybe you’re wrong and just wanting your ideal to be the case?

  • Majorllama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Even the existence of the phrase “vote blue no matter who” is a dead giveaway as to why the Democrats failed… Again.

    You cannot run entirely on simply not being the other party. That is not enough to entice voters on the fence. You might think it is and those people on the fence are too stupid so they should just “vote blue no matter who”, but clearly that hasn’t been fucking work for the Democrats.

    • Zexks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Trump begging to be king should have been enough. The fact that it wasn’t shows it’s not just ‘what the democrats do’ it’s that people are fucking stupid and hateful. Hell the VP doesn’t even know where this country came from. These people are not American. They’re traitors to the red coats and don’t even know what that means.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The fact that it wasn’t shows it’s not just ‘what the democrats do’ it’s that people are fucking stupid and hateful.

        Well here’s the thing: The average person does not, in fact, care about nebulous ideas like democracy. And why would they? Why did the democracy people do for them? Hint: The answer is nothing. That’s why they vote Republican, because Republicans promise change rather than more of the same.

        • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          The average person does not, in fact, care about nebulous ideas like democracy.

          Then they are profoundly stupid and have no right to live in, and benefit from, a democracy. They shame the people who died to give it to them.

          And why would they?

          Because people died to give it to them and they benefit GREATLY from it.

          Why did the democracy people do for them? Hint: The answer is nothing.

          Ignorant comment. Look up the democrat’s voting history. It is full of votes in favor of the middle/lower classes. They gave me affordable healthcare when I was young and poor. The last democrat president forgave part or all of a lot of people’s student loans. It also isn’t just about what they do, it’s about what they don’t do. Like shit on the Constitution. Strip women of rights. Deconstruct our federal government. Fire a bunch of veterans. Destroy our allegiances.

          because Republicans promise change rather than more of the same.

          Sure, but the change is always negative. Economically and socially.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            It is full of votes in favor of the middle/lower classes.

            I wouldn’t call it full of them, but this statement is in essence true. However, they don’t go nearly far enough. The Democrats promise bandaids as the country is dragged towards late stage capitalism hell by the ultra rich, and then they apply some of those bandaids as the country is—predictably—dragged toeards late stage capitalism hell by the ultra rich. The Republicans promise to end that and finally Make America Great Again. This strikes close to home because things have been getting worse for the majority of people for the last four decades, so when someone tells them that’s the cultural Marxists’ fault and if we end DEI things will get better like they were in the pre-DEI past they listen. That’s what I meant by democracy not doing anything for them; the bandaids don’t feel like they matter when they do nothing about the guy squeezing the wound for blood.

            Sure, but the change is always negative. Economically and socially.

            That’s what they actually do. What they promise to do is Make America Great (and white) Again. It’s the fascist playbook to the letter; they redirect the working class’s resentment rooted in their worsening circumstances from the ruling class to an imaginary enemy (Jews, immigrants, etc) that they then persecute while promising their followers that one more pogrom and things will get better. There’s only one counterplay to this and it’s to actually go after the ultra rich and build a more equitable society.

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You ignore one simple fact.

      The GOP always votes Red, no matter who.

      It takes two sides to have a reasonable discussion, but only one side to start a war.

      It’s a war and you’ve been invaded.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The GOP always votes Red, no matter who.

        They literally don’t though. They voted for Trump because they liked him, not because he ran as a Republican. There’s that phenomenon where Trump voters also vote for candidates like AOC or Bernie Sanders, so… Yeah.

      • mmcintyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        GOP also always picks a Republican head of the FBI when they’re in charge. So does the Democratic president. Why is that?

        You may want to inform party leadership there’s a war on, they been out here trying to pull a muscle reaching across the aisle.

      • Majorllama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Except the GOP doesn’t always vote red, not matter who. I am friends with several people who are still registered Republicans that did not vote for Trump either time.

        Fucking echo chambers are dangerous man.

        • Zexks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Trump had a difference of less than a million votes between this election and his first. You friends are anecdotes that don’t move the needle. They are the exception not the rule.

      • yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The fascist party always votes for fascists without thought? Who woulda guessed.

        Guess we gotta be fascists and vote without thought to beat them! Why has no one just tried to out fascist fascists before, it’s so simple and you’re so smart for coming up with that strategy.

        • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          So what’s your plan?

          How do we get Trump out? Create a 3rd Party in under 24 months?

          Any usable ideas?

          • yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Acknowledge the problems Americans are actually facing, pick the leaders of the thousands of protests currently happening as grass roots campaigners, identify of those leaders who has the admin experience to do the boring jobs of an elected official, while folding in the hundreds of third party reps already in office by simply taking their talking points into the platform. Ideally make a show of rejecting corporate funding and roll some union leaders into the party to provide easy consistent funding sources.

            People are happy to vote for things, if they believe you’re not a cop or corporate puppet, like Harris or Clinton respectively.

            Oh, and public executions for people that think you can’t have a third party in fptp even when one party falls entirely out of favor.

            • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              So, the same people who didn’t show up for Bernie in 2016, 2020, and 2024 are suddenly going to come to the polls now?

              People keep posting like there’s this giant army of leftists out there. I haven’t seen them yet, and don’t plan on counting on them.

              Also, your plan is remarkably light on details. Are these people going to be voting in Dem primaries, or creating a 3rd party.

              And there’s not one candidate named. Just some vague Not Hillary Clinton.

              • yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Yes, the people that thought sanders had no chance due to dnc corruption that they were objectively correct about will mobilize for someone without that restriction. If sanders were to start a third party he alone would ensure the dnc never gets another candidate in office. And he’s a moderate.

                Because of the rules on civility, I’m going to say this as absolutely nicely as I can. Who the fuck are you to demand more from a random on the internet than the entire democratic party has ever given anyone?

                It’s a more concrete plan than continuing to go far right as the Dems did in the last two elections where they lost.

                M4a has around a 70% approval rating in polls, as does measures like focusing on green energy, taxing the rich, providing free college, retraining police, and reducing the power of the executive. Hell even ubi has over 50% in most polls. “Leftist” policies are popular. Hell socialism is extremely popular. You just can’t use the word socialist or communist thanks to 80 years of you people existing.

                • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I asked for a plan. You don’t have one. You can’t even name a candidate. And somehow this is all my fault.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The GOP always votes Red, no matter who.

        How’d that work out?

        Seriously, if your plan is to follow the same path as Republicans, does that mean you think it’s worked out well for them the last 20 years?

        Are republican voters being taken care of by their elected officials or did having no standards and excusing everything their party did just make it so the most corrupt candidate advances to the general?

        What is different about Dems that would make the result be literally the opposite, and how much more time do you think we should waste seeing if it works?

        Instead of running a charismatic candidate with a progressive which statistically results in the presidency, House, and Senate?

        Why not take the easy path that gets us what we want instead of the hardest path where we get the least reward?

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That is not enough to entice voters on the fence.

      It’s your hellscape, fence-sitters. Idiots. If only you could have done something, any one goddamn thing to have avoided this gutting of democracy, this looting of generations of social capital, demonizing of progressive causes and the establishment of a russian vassal state.

      But I understand the candidate was not exciting enough to get off the fence.

      You coulda been somebody, Charlie, you coulda been a contender.

      • Majorllama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh my God it’s like talking to a brick wall with you people.

        The Democrats have been running on a platform of “we aren’t Trump” for 3 elections in a row. They lost two of them.

        This loss falls on Democrat leadership far more than it falls on the people on the fence.

        The fact is the Democrats failed to convince enough people they were the better option. Mostly because they tried the same strategy against the same opponent 3 fucking times.

        • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          This loss falls on Democrat leadership far more than it falls on the people on the fence.

          Sounds like you like making excuses for shitstain losers who sit around waiting for a political party to court them instead of doing their fucking homework and making responsible decisions.

          • missingno@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Sounds like you making excuses for a shitstain party who sits around waiting for wins to come to them instead of learning from mistakes and fixing those mistakes next time.

          • Majorllama@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            And you’re still not getting it.

            This is actually hilarious to watch. You’ve got multiple people in here explaining it multiple ways and y’all still can’t wrap your heads around it.

            • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              And you’re still not getting it.

              Nah bud, you’re not getting it.

              Politicians come and go. Political parties go through phases where they’re better and worse at advertising themselves. The American voters who failed to do their civic duty by responsibly informing themselves, choosing instead to sit around and wait for a party to court them until they felt appeased, will still be there next go around, waiting to not do their civic duty again, entirely dependent on whether they feel a party appeased them enough or not.

              Because they’re too fucking lazy to do simple things like looking up the voting history of said party. I did. Now I don’t need Democrats to court me like I’m some dipshit prom queen because I KNOW they are the better option, whether they court me or not.

              • Majorllama@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                And you’re still digging. This is fucking comical.

                Keeping calling those people who didn’t do exactly what you wanted a bunch of fucking idiots. I’m sure that will win them over for next time!

                Democrats “Vote for us no matter what or you’re an uneducated fuckwit”

                Also Democrats “I can’t believe acting like elitist snobs and calling people who might have voted our way idiots didn’t work!”

                Just keeeeeep doubling down.

                2028 is gonna be really rough for y’all if you keep this mentality the whole time.

  • missingno@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Did the DNC’s strategy work? No? Then the Democrats were wrong.

    It’s their job to convince voters to vote for them. And if they won’t take responsibility for failing at their job, then they’re on course to do the exact same thing in 2028 and get the exact same results.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Did the DNC’s strategy work? No? Then the Democrats were wrong.

      The biggest flaw in the DNC strategy, it appears, is not appearing as a ‘maybe rich’ felony rapist traitor facing multiple election tampering and secrets cases, telling some bullshit story about magical prosperity for all.

      That’s their flaw.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s their job to convince voters to vote for them

      Everytime this topic comes up it reminds me of incels whining no women wants them…

      They don’t want to change anything, they don’t want to compromise, they want a participation trophy for just existing. What’s insane is that’s been the strategy for the last three presidential elections.

      And if they won’t take responsibility for failing at their job, then they’re on course to do the exact same thing in 2028 and get the exact same results.

      The new DNC chair has been very vocal about what the problem is, how to fix, and is already running the same playbook that solidified his home state blue.

      The DNC is basically the chair, and we just got a much better chair than we’ve had in decades.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          “We’re calling it the ‘Organize Everywhere’ tour,” Martin told ABC13. “It’s a simple premise that if we’re going to win throughout this country and get back into power, we have to organize everywhere. We’re visiting red states, purple states, and blue states on this tour. And Texas really is the future of the Democratic Party. This is such a critical battleground state as we move forward in the 2026 elections – of course, the 28 election cycle and beyond.”

          https://www.msn.com/en-us/politics/government/abc13-has-1-on-1-with-new-democratic-national-committee-chair-ken-martin/ar-AA1zI1f4

          But you don’t have to go on hypotheticals, he has a long history in Minnesota, and supporting candidates voters want translated to wins.

          It’s not even that overtly progressive, he just knows it’s easiest to win if voters already like the candidate and policy. And voters like charismatic candidates with progressive policy stances.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s their job to convince voters to vote for them.

      And it’s the voters DUTY to inform themselves responsibly and make the best choice for the welfare of their nation. American voters failed to do so.

      • missingno@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        We can’t do anything about that, wagging your finger at voters will not accomplish anything. But we CAN do something about the party itself, the candidate, and the campaign strategy.

        Fixating on things we can’t change is a way to deflect from having actual productive conversations about things that we can change. It’s a way for the DNC to avoid taking responsibility.

        • Katana314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The Democrats are made of people. If you believe people can’t change, we’re fucked anyway. Thankfully, I believe you’re wrong.

        • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          We can’t do anything about that, wagging your finger at voters will not accomplish anything.

          If we can’t do anything about American voters being complacent and lazy and not doing their civic duty responsibly, then we have, and will continue to have, way bigger problems than a party not being good at promoting themselves. And, oh look, we are.

          We can’t just keep ignoring the source of our problem. People HAVE to get responsibly engaged in politics if we want out of this situation. Otherwise, even if Dems get better at messaging, we’ll just slingshot back to where we are now if they stop being good at it again.

          Apparently it’s going to take a lot of pain and suffering for Americans to become more responsible voters. If it’s even possible at this point.

          • missingno@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            It is a candidate’s job to convince voters to vote for them. That is what campaigning is. Sitting here and wagging your finger, on the other hand, is not campaigning.

            We cannot tie the entire US electorate down and force them to “be more responsible”. That is not a useful or productive way to look at the problem. If that is all you fixate on, you have no actionable solution out of it.

            But what we can do is run better candidates with a better campaign, that will inspire voters to want to vote for them. That is how it works, that has always been how it works, and if we ignore that, we will lose in 2028.

            The point I am making here is that we need to talk about things we can actually do something about, instead of shutting down the conversation by deflecting to things we cannot do anything about.

          • Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            the way to compell voters is through education, livable wages, and a prosperous life. it is an inherent catch 22.

            you cannot blame a victim of propaganda that they were propagandised. especially if they are a dumb fuck

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I’m still waiting for whatever the hell is supposed to happen after electoral politics has failed us, because it has.

    I was told by people pushing for people to not bother voting in 2024 that voting was meaningless and that Trump would be no different than Harris. People told me that the solidarity of grassroots organization was the only way to see any real change, and that we had to reject the DNC at all costs. Well, we rejected it. What now?

    PS: I don’t even mean this sarcastically or to win internet points – that are even more meaningless than on reddit – on this site. I’m actually asking, what are we doing now that this happened?

    • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you’re genuinely asking some basic actions for a broad and general audience looking for political engagement:

      A lot of states have initiatives and referendums citizens can bring to a vote in elections. There may be a grassroots organization working on an issue you may align with. (Especially vote reform groups looking to introduce alternatives to how we elect our government.)

      Following this: Don’t be a stranger to your local government. At least learn who they are if you don’t. Your state reps and senators, your federal rep and senators, your kids’ school superintendent, the elected sheriff. Vote in the primaries, the odd years, the midterms, the big presidential tickets. And this isn’t ‘just vote’ advice. I mean vote for politicians pushing policies you agree with, regardless of party or incumbency. Don’t be afraid to third party in a primary (if you can).

      Join community groups and socialize in meatspace. There may be community centers and libraries around you with things to engage with. As much as online spaces can help people feel connected or a shared or safe place, the politics and governance is maintained on the meatspace level of your neighbors. Your district is likely gerrymandered but it’s worth finding out where you stand in the whole tapestry of American governance. (This one can be a huge hurdle, and I understand. Most of my community are military so progressives get like 200 votes per 10,000 pure military industrial zionism. I barely amount to this advice myself, FWIW.)

  • yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Or, you know, be the party that at least promises popular things, instead of the party that just exists in idle opposition.

    At least we’ll never have to worry about Dems after 2026. Maybe some better parties can take hold

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Maybe some better parties can take hold

      Parties are essentially dictatorships, and at the top of my list of things wrong with our system

      The good part of that, is the party can change even faster than trump can destroy America.

      • Zexks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Partie’s will always exist. They are a natural progression of people aligning their values. You can call them different names but a ‘group of politically aligned people’ will always form.

    • LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Right? All they had to do was promise to Legalize weed, increase the minimum wage, put caps on rent increases, go after shrinkflation, make it easier to vote, say that healthcare is a human right, fight for unions, promise to help support people who currently can’t afford to buy homes to be able to buy homes, and tax the rich and corporations more.

      Oh wait, Harris did all of those things. Democrats have had progressive policy, but voters keep voting against it. Because Democrats have to be perfect and cant also happen to have a couple shit policies. The moment they have a couple shitty policies, or don’t have all the progressive policies people want. those are all that matter and that means Democrats are just the same as Republicans.

      • yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The problem is they’ve been promising that for two decades.

        They’re great at saying things, sometimes, to specific outlet while saying the opposite to their donors and other outlets. But they’re terrible at doing anything. At all. After decades of lies, after decades of trying to push them left… The Harris campaign paid partial lip service and promised what Obama did in 2008.

        Also no, Dems are the same as Republicans because their goals, based on their actions and voting records, are exactly the same. Make rich people more rich, bust unions, keep the poor poor.

        • 0ops@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I was with you until you went all “both sides”. Dems fucking suck, they’re inauthentic, corrupt leaches, but the last 6 weeks alone ought to be plenty enough to prove that the repubs are whole other animal. These are officially Nazi’s we’re dealing with.

          • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            And the Dems hold up tiny signs in protest rather than actually do anything

            The Dems don’t care and won’t fight so they’re functionally the same

        • LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          They’ve increased taxes in 2009 in response to the crash, they’ve done investment in infrastructure. They’ve passed the first climate change legislation ever in this country. They increased the minimum wage in 2009 and tried to again. They did actual shit for the 4 years of the last 2 decades they’ve had full power to do anything. But then voters vote them out because they don’t do everything they intended to.

          They need do more, but they need full power to do that. Whenever they get that they do shit. But it’s impossible to do shit when Republicans control one house of Congress kneecapping everything they want to do.

          Also they are incredibly different. One of them wants to increase the minimum wage, the other wants to get rid of it. One of them wants to make sure queer folk are allowed to exist in public and have rights, the other wants to put us in prison and take away our right to exist at all. One of them wants to bust monopolies and the other wants more monopolies. One of them wants to increase social safety net benefits, the other wants to get rid of it. One of them wants to tax the rich, the other wants no federal income tax at all. One of them believes that voting should be easy and the other wants to make voting impossible.

          They’ve passed plenty of bills that end up dying because of Republicans, you’re blaming Democrats for Republicans being the problem and saying they’re the same. You’re being reductive because they happen to both be capitalist parties, which sucks ass but there’s a lot of space in the capitalist spectrum.

          Listen, there’s nothing wrong with wanting Democrats to do better. But it’s BS to say they haven’t done anything positive in the last 20 years. 20 years where they only actually had full power for 4 of those years and 2 of those years only barely had a majority in the Senate.

          Edit: also most of what I said Harris campaigned on has not been promised for 2 decades. She campaigned on policies that the party hadn’t supported on the presidential level before. The only democratic presidential nominee to campaign on legalizing weed was Harris. The only one to campaign on a unrealized gains tax was Harris. The only one to campaign on the down payment assistance was Harris. Biden talked about increasing the minimum wage too but that was 4 years ago so not over the last 20 years.

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    What done is done. Democratic voters PUT TRUMP BACK IN OFFICE to send a message. If the party leaders don’t get the message, then 4 years of Trump were all for not.

  • eksb@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    “Democrats are not doing enough to encourage people to vote for Democrats.” is a warning, not a threat.

    People who make and post memes like this seem to think that the people complaining about conservative Democrats and pointing out problems in the party are not voting for Democrats. I think they largely wrong about that. We are voting for all Democrats all the time, but warning you that your messaging sucks and you are not going to get the turnout you need. It is not our fault we were correct.

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It is not our fault we were correct.

      No. It’s your fault you’re not doing anything about it.

      Create a community for every state and win the midterms (where applicable). Start there.

      • eksb@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        We are trying. I volunteer for campaigns and knock on doors for progressive candidates. And they get attacked by the kind of democrats who take most of their campaign contributions from property developers and car dealerships.

        If you are voting for the establishment and attacking anybody who brings up valid criticisms, YOU are not doing anything about it.

    • Zexks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The whole genocide joe Gaza bullshit proves this wrong. There were plenty of ‘protest’ votes this round. But their protest issues were stupid because trump had worse direction on all of them but for whatever reason that was ignored and everyone focused on Harris and Biden. As if trump wasn’t just waiting to glass the whole place and turn it into a resort or golf course already.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        for whatever reason that was ignored and everyone focused on Harris and Biden.

        It’s because Democrats have always been held to higher standards. Because we expect nothing from Republicans, because Republicans never deliver. Ever. So now all our expectations rest on Democrats and when you place all your expectations on one thing, it will always fail to live up.

        So Democrats have to be flawless while Republicans get to literally be lawless.

        Pretty stupid country we’ve got here. Signing our democracy away because one party can’t be perfect.

        • njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Man being anti-genicide isn’t the bar for flawless buddy. The bar is way higher than that. Flawless is not what you use to describe something that everyone should be except fucking war criminals.

        • bishbosh@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Democrats have to be flawless

          They really don’t and the fact that you don’t see that is why the blindness of the dems lead to their failure.

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Wrong! ANY criticism of the party means you’re a secret maga Russian plant. The democrats are perfect and don’t need to improve in any way!

      /s

    • 0ops@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Exactly. “Back the blue no matter who” is great and dandy in the months between primaries and the election, but at any other time it’s a straight-up nonsense phrase. We’re now well into the “Who’ll be the new blue?” stage, and the last thing we need is to let some ancient, entitled, dem politician shuffle in and take “their turn” and for democrats to just go with it again. Now’s the time to build a movement against the dnc establishment and for the progressive wing.

      I also don’t really see the point in the meme and ones like it. The election already happened, and whether you personally blame voters or the dnc, either way it’s the dnc’s problem to fix or they’re gonna go extinct.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The point is we failed to promote the DNC in those months when it actually mattered and millions of people who voted for the party before stayed home instead. We need to promote the DNC, not just shit on them. We need to convince people to vote for those fucking mummies and those tech and science illiterate dolts because the alternative is worse and we need to scream that from the mountaintops “The DNC will protect you. The DNC will enrich your lives. Voting against the DNC is self-harm. The GOP wants DEATH for Profits.”

        • 0ops@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          After the primaries yes, we should do all of that. And though it sounds like I’m taking a shit on the dnc (well tbh I kinda am), the way I see it they’re in serious need of some constructive criticism, because ironically for a “democratic” party they’re incredibly out of touch with their voters, proved by a good portion of them not even showing up for them the last major election. Now is the perfect time to work on the dnc.

          The DNC will protect you. The DNC will enrich your lives

          See this might be marginally true, certainly more true of the dnc than the gop, but that’s a low bar and there’s so much room for improvement. A lot of Dems are transparently in the pockets of the wealthy, and many protections are lip-service at best. I’ve even read articles recently about a few dem politicians walking back their pro-trans-rights positions. If now was post-primary, I’d be hold my breath ticked off that the lesser evil chose to be a little more evil at the last second, but now is the time to clean up the mess and build a more popular and representative dnc before the next major election. They can start by taking a sloganeering class

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Yes, stop thinking and just follow the herd! That’s surely the solution! \s

    Thankfully I live in a state where my vote doesn’t matter at all. jfc.

    How many years can the libs keep this up?

  • WraithGear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Oh this again? Democratic Party: has our Neo liberalism, refusal to enact progressive policy, and backing of a genocide alienated progressive voters? Disenfranchised voter: damn it we told you a thousand times yes! Democratic Party: No it’s the voters who are wrong.

    • pachrist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Hey, hey, marketing yourself as Fascism Lite: Low Sodium as opposed to Fascism Original Recipe has to work at some point, right?

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Gotta keep tugging for those republican votes. We may need to adopt some republican priorities in order to get those voters, but its all for a good cause right?