• mesa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    It would be ironic if businesses come back to California because of the tariffs.

    • Sprawl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Newsweek is pretty close to a tabloid these days. They are a tad better than the NY Post, but not by much.

  • MECHAGODZILLA2@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Anyone speaking of secession - please, read history. We do not want to do that again, I don’t care what you believe in, it is a terrible idea. Please think it through beyond how admittedly awesome it would be in theory alone.

    • ubergeek@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Im familiar with history, and yes, I would love for my state to leave the current union… It’s a failed democracy.

    • dukeofdummies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s even worse today. The amount of interconnected systems we have in play would be absolutely chaos to try and separate.

      We didn’t have to worry about power grids, networking, food was FAR more local, it would take years to try to isolate yourself from it all on a statewide scale.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s a terrible idea, but so is invading Greenland, Canada, or Panama. We don’t do such things anymore, read history why, but yet, here we are.

      This is how a possible secession starts. Trump might prohibit California from doing this because it goes against his masters plan of destroying the US, California doesn’t want to become a husk of it’s former self and pushes through.

      If California were to secede, it would immediately break the rest of the US. All the red states have been so poorly managed for decades that they near fully rely in handouts from successful states like California. With California gone, other blue and successful states would likely follow because they won’t be able to pay the bill for those states either, splitting the US into a successful new country and dirt poor third world type theocratic dictatorship nation. Maybe it wouldn’t be the worst thing, let the christo fascists live in the hell hole that they want

      Secession(s) will likely include a civil war, and right now with the decade of trump shit causing division and chaos, I think that too isn’t too far fetched anymore. There is nothing as horrible as neighbor fighting neighbors, ask Yugoslavia, but here we are in Trump’s world.

    • rocket_dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Wouldn’t MAGA supposedly be thrilled for California to leave?

      I’m trying to imagine trumper militia marching into California saying, “we need to keep this liberal shithole and it’s 54 blue electoral votes”.

      Yeah, it would be devastating for the US economy, but if MAGA has told us anything it’s that they prefer to tank the economy than embrace any kind of diversity.

  • Lit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    But the tariffs are paid by American. It is tax on Americans. Why would foreign country care too much.

    • derfunkatron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      There are a lot of complicated reasons why high tariff are a global problem in a global economy, but simply put:

      1. High tariffs raise prices
      2. High prices reduce sales
      3. Fewer sales reduces profit

      Reduced profit for a single company or industry isn’t usually detrimental to a national or global economy. But when an entire country’s economy is hit with reduced profits across every industry, then it creates a problem.

      So in summary, Americans are going to get fucked directly, “foreign countries” are going to get fucked indirectly.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        So in summary, Americans are going to get fucked directly, “foreign countries” are going to get fucked indirectly.

        And the only people who win are the billionaires that get to swoop in and buy everything up at bargain basement prices.

      • Lit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I am not affected by tariffs, but I am going to further raise the prices of my digital goods on US platforms anyway. Because i noticed people buy anyway when i raised prices earlier this year.

        my impact is extremely tiny, but if everyone does it, especially for essential products sold to US. This might help a nation as a whole compensate for loss of revenue in other industries affected by tariffs.

        Most people in US will think the higher prices for everything are due to tariffs.

        • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Eh, what do you sell and on which platform? I’d like to avoid you, firstly, and secondly, knowing that will give me an idea of what to tell you to expect.

          I’m buying less these days. Going on less vacations. Picking up fewer wants, and limiting my purchases to needs. Reducing the amount of money I spend. I am seeing it as more money is going into savings now than when Biden was POTUS. Gonna need to do that because everything’s about to get more expensive. I need to get used to doing more with less, because otherwise, I’m going to take it right in the chin. As will many of my American counterparts.

          You might escape scott free. Or you might not. Your country likely is tariffing everything from the USA, and the USA is likely tariffing you as well. You might find fewer people buy your stuff because not ONLY has the US tariffed money out of your buyers, you’re exploiting them as well, meaning they get double hit. While it’s your right to set your price to what you want, don’t be surprised if your sales take a hit. Also, it’s a very douchebag move to take advantages of your customers…just like what the Shitgibbon would do, so I do hope your customers look elsewhere for their sales. Too bad we as Americans don’t have that luxury to avoid tariffs.

          • Lit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Even if I sell less it doesn’t matter, the higher prices makes up for it. I don’t need to sell much at higher price. People buy my stuff usually to save time, they are trying to meet project deadlines. As long as it is cheaper to buy instead of building it themselves which might take days, weeks they are still saving time and money.

            Note that I raise prices on US platform only. My prices on site based in Europe (Lithuania) is much lower (American can buy from there if they bother to search, I do see US customers IPs on my sale stats), If you really want to talk about greed and douchebag-ness it is the US platforms that are super greedy they are taking more than 60% from each of my sales. While the Europe platform only take 30%. So I could care less if I lose sale on the US sites, I prefer if my customer buy from europe site instead.

            It seems countries getting hit by tariffs don’t tariff US goods as high as trump is claiming, https://www.threads.net/@aaliamauro/post/DICFOusPqD1

            US doesn’t even export enough goods to some of those countries to hit tariff triggers. So most item remain tariff free. https://edition.cnn.com/2025/04/02/politics/fact-check-trump-tariffs-trade/index.html

            The tariffs broken down by internet level domain makes no sense, It looks very unscientific and lazy.

            • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              I see you avoided answering my question, so it’s a lot harder to give you hard facts, but let’s look at a hypothetical purchase in Lithuania.

              First, you don’t seem to understand how tariffs work. We don’t pay tariffs on exports. We pay it on imports. Let’s say you sell a widget from your page for $10. To get it into the USA, I’d have to pay you $10, and Uncle Sam $2. Doesn’t matter how much you sell or don’t sell. The shitgibbon has demanded his 20%, and so if I were to buy something from you, I’d have to give $0.20 for every $1.00 I give you.

              But that’s just the start of the hurt. European Union countries are likely to tariff us back. So if you order your raw materials from the USA, your own country is gonna be standing there with its hand out. That 4.56 EUR you were going to pay a US company also has a 0.91 EUR extra charge added to it by your country. So you raise from $10.00 to $11.00 to make up that extra 0.91 EUR…which then means I have to pay $2.20 to the Shitgibbon, pushing my price up to $13.20 US, JUST so you can still make your profit target.

              Some countries are mulling export taxes as well. Ontario, for example, is putting a 25% export tariff on electricity shipped to the northern US. If Lithuania decides that widgets need a 20% export tariff, now, suddenly, your 10.04 EUR item now has Lithuania holding its hand out looking for 2.00 EUR. You’re not gonna want to eat that, so your price needs to increase so you get the same profit as before. Let’s say…13 EUR to make up the tariff margin (you end up giving 2.60 EUR to Lithuania, and are still giving 5.47 EUR to your supplier, leaving you with 4.93 left over), and now I’m paying $14.21 plus $2.84, for a total of 17.05. And this is all before you start talking about charging me even more.

              Digital products may currently escape this, so if you’re offering software or PDFs or NFTs or whatnot, you might indeed be not worried about the immediate nonsense going down.

              I have no problem with you if you’re raising your prices on platforms that take a bigger cut of your sales. I’d suggest you shop around for better platforms, and nothing says you have to use US platforms. I’d support you on an EU platform if that meant I paid less and you got paid more. It just seemed you were saying you were going to target Americans more just 'cause. We didn’t all vote for the Shitgibbon over here.

              As for your last three paragraphs? Yeah. “Preaching to the Choir” is what I’d tell you on that. Yes, the tariffs are stupid. And Trump is golfing while the economy burns.

              • Lit@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                You only asked a 2 part single question to find out which platform to avoid, you obviously know it would not be answered. I need you to pay the higher prices, not avoid the platform. Since you want to **avoid **the platform I **avoid **telling you, we both avoid so it is fair.

                Your explanation shows that you finally understand tariffs.

                Yes it is all about **upsizing **the impact on US and reducing impact elsewhere. Voting for tariffs clearly shows that majority of US citizen and government loves to pay more tax for foreign and local goods.

                You are right digital product/services escaped this for now, this means they might be affected in the future so based on your good advice I would have to raise prices for US so as to build up the buffer to weather the potential tariffs on digital goods/services.

                To help the non-US people, penguins and seals, I give discount vouchers to non US customers to help them further reduce cost outside US.

                I don’t need to shop around, I have mentioned my products are on other platforms.

                I would still put my product on that US platform and others, for the advertisement and to pull non-us customer away from them to a better deals elsewhere but some users are willing to pay the higher prices so let them pay. willing buyer willing seller. it is not going to bankrupt anyone don’t worry. Note, I am also raising rates for US clients for digital services too not just products. Need to build the buffer.

    • theherk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      They care because their economies rely on people buying the products. The reasons why tariffs hurt both sides is because the movement of products decays. That’s the whole idea, so that the products’ supply source changes.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Cool but Americans should cool down their consumerism anyways.They consume the vast majority of stuff which is why everyone wants into the market.

    • misteloct@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      There is a precedent for lawlessness. Literally anything is constitutional now, you just do it and ignore the court ruling. Where have you been the last decade?

  • CircaV@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    How would a state secede from the US? Like, what’s the actual process?

      • CircaV@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I wonder if the same thing was said about the USSR as late as 1988?

    • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The best way would be quiet quitting. Making routes to federal buildings surrounded by construction and road closures at odd times. Overlapping federal job descriptions internally and never communicating with federal equivalents unless required, and that with a “great email, still working on that!” Or “emailed Oregon about that and they had some great ideas, get with them for the data!”

      Offering great state guard contracts to all military eligible to re-up, that exceed what the feds offer. Build out coastal protection fleet due to “them darn migrants.” Train your military in FPV as if you were what the US should be doing right now, so the feds know any pushback will be costly, and you’re not breaking any laws anyway, remember?

      Tell your state and local police we don’t work with the FBI or IRS in cooperation any more, and let the populace know the feds must individually enforce all tax law. That’s where it’s good for the Feds to remember that’s not required, and the 4th amendment prevents them being forced to act… in fact, that makes them subject to arrest for trying due to the laws of the great state of california.

      All legal, and petty. But legal.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Legally, a state can’t secede really, but the other states could agree to let it go. It would require a Constitutional Convention, which would require 2/3 of states to agree to let it go.

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      That’s what the Civil War was about, there is no legal way to exit were one nation period end of story millions of dead soldiers proved it.

      If a state tried to leave they would have to prove they could no matter the laws. It would be war. No ifs ands or buts. That means having a military that could take out the US military. Currently the top Airforce in the world is the US Airforce, the second largest Airforce is the US Navy, then it’s Russia, then it’s the US Army. Unless you can somehow convince the military to side with you when you leave, it’s not going to happen. I would imagine if you tried to claim it legally the best you could hope for is Federal agents walking in the second said state gov claims independence, and idk arresting the heads of state for treason, and telling said state to elect a new gov.

      • CircaV@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        But what is the US military going to do? go to a state that wants to secede and just kill everyone in it??

    • BussyCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      You need to amend the constitution which requires 38 states to agree to it that considering how many right wing states hate California doesn’t sound impossible

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      There is no process. States cannot just up and say “see ya” on their own, we fought a war over that.

      If the people felt that it would be OK for a state to leave, the proper thing to do would be to pass an amendment stating a process, and then the state would do it. There would be a lot of details to hammer out: does the State get to keep Federal property (like military bases)? Does it inherit a share of the deficit? What happens to deferred US taxes on things like 401k accounts?

      IMHO it would take so long to hammer that stuff out that it’s basically impossible.

      • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        “But it’s not legal!”

        Have you learned nothing the past three months? Laws are what we make of them.

        A state seceding is a simple process:

        1. The state passes an act to allow it.

        2. The sitting president endorses the idea and agrees to let them go peacefully.

        That’s it. The United States Constitution itself was illegally written, an exercise in simple willful power. State secession works the same way.

          • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Meh. If everyone in California pitched in $1 and we straight up bribed him $35 million, I’m pretty sure he’d go off screaming about what a great idea it is and MAGA would eat it up.

    • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The state government would put forwards a local movement to secede from the US, and if it actually passed the federal government would butt in and go “you can’t secede, that’s completely illegal and unconstitutional” (it is), at which point the state would either go “oh well” and stand down or go “go suck eggs” and continue trying to secede, which the federal government would treat as rebellion or insurrection.

      • laranis@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        So, easy then! We know insurrections aren’t a big deal and have no real consequences. Full steam ahead!

        /s just in case

        • Sk3rgi0@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          The FBI is going to pull a Sea Bear attack on you but wait you used “/s” so you’re good to go. LOL

      • j0ester@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Even if the federal government says “okay”. They may actually turn around and pretend it never happened… or they can start a war with them.

        • Lukas Murch@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I don’t think the GOP would start a war just to start a war. They are a party grounded in principles and morals, and aren’t petty little bitches.

          /s

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Succession! And we’re taking Hawaii Oregon and Washington. We can trade with the EU and Canada. Maybe we can join the EU

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    “United” States stands divided. It just gets worse…and at an incredible speed. It’s always quicker and easier to demolish as opposed to building. Every one wants the easy money and the quick buck without a balanced expenditure of energy.

  • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Last civil war was about state rights to own slaves. Now its state right to avoid trade distribution?

    My god the writers need to be fired.

        • sunflowercowboy@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yes, but remember the Jews are a very crafty folk. They are building their plot of canonization through trump - however their is one other person that could supercede his religious seat.

          The right name, at the right time, in the right place makes all the difference.

          However normal people are so antichristian without even trying to understand the reasoning behind a christian book. Which I find really frustrating, as they don’t understand it is pivotal to capturing the world’s heart. It has been used as the archetype for the modern worker and their submission. Submission to each other is kindness, and peaceful. However, we are forced to submit to a faceless corporation, for which we must revere, fear, and hold above all else while in position. Essentially making a false god in all but name, however this unbreathing beast controls your lives.

  • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Good. There is no point in being part of a government that doesn’t believe in governance. Here’s hoping that other Blue States join a compact with California.

    • whaleiam@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Trump has been withholding fema money allocated to California. They are stealing disaster funds. He also wasted billions of gallons of water during the la , for a headline, pretending that he did something. Wasting that water when we have a wet/dry season is detrimental for farming. Destroying food supply/ water supply In reality that’s attrition and is an act of war, he is attacking Californians extra hard, but he also attacking all Americans.

      • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        That flag comes from a videogame series, called Fallout. The premise is that America or China began a nuclear war, with horrific results for the world as a whole. At least a couple hundred years later, the player is released from the confines of a fallout shelter. These vaults housed the remnants of humanity as we knew them, and they are now emerging to recolonize the earth.

        Thing is, some critters had children, despite the excessive radiation. New California’s national animal, the bear, tends to have an extra pair of heads.

        If the premise of the series interests you, I recommend New Vegas as your starting point. It has the most narrative strength in the series and is user friendly in comparison to the original games. Fallout 4 is approachable, but lost writing and player choice, unfortunately.

        Fallout trailers, all of them.

        • Yeather@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Actually no Yao Guai in game have two heads. Though it should be noted the only Yao Guai you run into when playing are balck bears, so possibly grizzly bears as depicted on the flag do get two heads.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Kudos to California. The neo-Nazi filled MAGA is all about state rights and I hope they tell California to secede.

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Trump has got another great idea. A tax of 1.5 million dollars for each ship made in China that will dock at any American port, or 1 million if the ship is not made in china but the shipper fleet has a majority of Chinese ships.

    So, off before they did like California, Panama, Louisiana, new York, those stops will increase the price of shipping by 4.5 million dollars.

    Trump thinks that in this way, in a couple weeks, shipyards will reopen in the states and everyone will buy American ships. Because it takes a couple days to build an oil tanker

    Result:

    They’ll just unload the goods in Canada or Mexico then use trains/trucks. For oil and coal and wheat and other stuff that can’t be easily transported by land without ax existing infrastructure, that’s an additional 20% cost on top of tariffs. Inflation go go go

    • Lanske@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah Trump wants the US to be a great shipbuilder again… but for that you need materials (steel), workers who want to do that sort of job( he’s deporting a lot of people) and skill to manufacture ships…

      He thinks by taxing countries or companies, they will go to the US, but they won’t, and if they do it takes time and a lot of investment…

  • samuelazers@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    As i read this, i am remembered of Newsom meeting Trump, after he refused to help with Californian wildfires.

  • Rene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    EU is already trying to specifically target products from red states with tariffs.